158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29354011)
1. Application of Deconvolution Algorithm of Point Spread Function in Improving Image Quality: An Observer Preference Study on Chest Radiography.
Chae KJ; Goo JM; Ahn SY; Yoo JY; Yoon SH
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(1):147-152. PubMed ID: 29354011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Potential Role of Grid-Like Software in Bedside Chest Radiography in Improving Image Quality and Dose Reduction: An Observer Preference Study.
Ahn SY; Chae KJ; Goo JM
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(3):526-533. PubMed ID: 29713231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital chest imaging: selenium radiography versus storage phosphor imaging. Comparison of visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
Biemans JM; Van Heesewijk JP; Van Der Graaf Y
Invest Radiol; 2002 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 11753154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study.
Balassy C; Prokop M; Weber M; Sailer J; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):752-6. PubMed ID: 15728593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interpretation of normal anatomic structures on chest radiography: comparison of Fuji computed radiography (FCR) 5501D with FCR 5000 and screen-film system.
Nakashima K; Ashizawa K; Ochi M; Hashmi R; Hayashi K; Gotoh S; Honda S; Igarashi A; Komaki T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 12540822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital chest radiography with a large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector: clinical comparison with conventional radiography.
Hennigs SP; Garmer M; Jaeger HJ; Classen R; Jacobs A; Gissler HM; Christmann A; Mathias K
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1688-96. PubMed ID: 11511890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation dose reduction and improvement of image quality in digital chest radiography by new spatial noise reduction algorithm.
Lee W; Lee S; Chong S; Lee K; Lee J; Choi JC; Lim C
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228609. PubMed ID: 32084154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Studies on trigonometric transform enhancement of chest radiograph based on its anatomical feature].
Cao X; Jiang D; Zheng C
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1998 Mar; 22(2):92-4, 97. PubMed ID: 12016837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. X-ray dark-field chest radiography: a reader study to evaluate the diagnostic quality of attenuation chest X-rays from a dual-contrast scanning prototype.
Kattau M; Willer K; Noichl W; Urban T; Frank M; De Marco F; Schick R; Koehler T; Maack HI; Renger B; Renz M; Sauter A; Leonhardt Y; Fingerle A; Makowski M; Pfeiffer D; Pfeiffer F
Eur Radiol; 2023 Aug; 33(8):5549-5556. PubMed ID: 36806571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
