These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29354011)

  • 21. Observer evaluation of scatter subtraction for digital portable chest radiographs.
    Baker JA; Floyd CE; Lo JY; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Aug; 28(8):667-70. PubMed ID: 8375997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital chest radiography--optimizing image processing parameters for the visibility of chest lesions and anatomy.
    Kheddache S; Denbratt L; Angelhed JE
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 22(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 8832241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. VISIBILITY OF STRUCTURES OF RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS WITH CYSTIC FIBROSIS IN CHEST TOMOSYNTHESIS: INFLUENCE OF ANATOMICAL LOCATION AND OBSERVER EXPERIENCE.
    Meltzer C; Båth M; Kheddache S; Ásgeirsdóttir H; Gilljam M; Johnsson ÅA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):177-87. PubMed ID: 26842827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Erratum: Application of Deconvolution Algorithm of Point Spread Function in Improving Image Quality: An Observer Preference Study on Chest Radiography.
    Chae KJ; Goo JM; Ahn SY; Yoo JY; Yoon SH
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(2):368. PubMed ID: 29521383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Conventional radiography and digital radiography of the thorax: evaluation of anatomo-radiological parameters].
    Del Maschio A; Vanzulli A; Panizza P; Del Maschio M; Rodighiero M; Cucchi E; Zanello A; Sironi S
    Radiol Med; 1989 Jun; 77(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 2756178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scatter compensation for digital chest radiography using maximum likelihood expectation maximization.
    Floyd CE; Baydush AH; Lo JY; Bowsher JE; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1993 May; 28(5):427-33. PubMed ID: 8496036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computed radiography versus mobile direct radiography for bedside chest radiographs: impact of dose on image quality and reader agreement.
    De Boo DW; Weber M; Deurloo EE; Streekstra GJ; Freling NJ; Dongelmans DA; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Sep; 66(9):826-32. PubMed ID: 21570679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bedside Chest Radiographs in the Intensive care Setting: Wireless Direct Radiography Compared to Computed Radiography.
    Audin CR; Aran S; Muse VV; Abbott GF; Ackman JB; Sharma A; Wu CC; Kalra MK; McLoud TC; Shepard JO; Fintelmann FJ; Gilman MD
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018 Nov; 47(6):397-403. PubMed ID: 29054314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Image quality in conventional chest radiography. Evaluation using the postprocessing tool Diamond View.
    Niemann T; Reisinger C; Rau P; Schwarz J; Ruis-Lopez L; Bongartz G
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Mar; 73(3):555-9. PubMed ID: 19185438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Suppression of translucent elongated structures: applications in chest radiography.
    Hogeweg L; Sanchez CI; van Ginneken B
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 32(11):2099-113. PubMed ID: 23880041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Börjesson S; Hoeschen C; Tischenko O; Kheddache S; Vikgren J; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):109-13. PubMed ID: 15933090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Scanning equalization radiography of the chest: assessment of image quality.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DP; Vogelstein E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Nov; 145(5):973-8. PubMed ID: 2931967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A method to optimize the processing algorithm of a computed radiography system for chest radiography.
    Moore CS; Liney GP; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):724-30. PubMed ID: 17709364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique].
    Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF
    Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality.
    Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 80(960):984-8. PubMed ID: 17940130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Support line and tube visibility in chest examinations using computed radiography.
    Huda W; Belden CJ; Webb LA; Palmer CK
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 9268908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of nodule location.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Flinck A; Ullman G; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):92-6. PubMed ID: 15933087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Usefulness of reduced image display size in softcopy reading: evaluation of lung nodules in chest screening.
    Bessho Y; Yamaguchi M; Fujita H; Azuma M
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):940-6. PubMed ID: 19446475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.