These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29354078)

  • 1. Learning to Detect Deception from Evasive Answers and Inconsistencies across Repeated Interviews: A Study with Lay Respondents and Police Officers.
    Masip J; Martínez C; Blandón-Gitlin I; Sánchez N; Herrero C; Ibabe I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2207. PubMed ID: 29354078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews.
    Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; Martínez C; Herrero C; Ibabe I
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1702. PubMed ID: 27847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An empirical test of the behaviour analysis interview.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 16718581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.
    Sukumar D; Wade KA; Hodgson JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 42(2):145-155. PubMed ID: 29672094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using reality monitoring to improve deception detection in the context of the cognitive interview for suspects.
    Logue M; Book AS; Frosina P; Huizinga T; Amos S
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 25844516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.
    Vrij A; Mann SA; Fisher RP; Leal S; Milne R; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 17694424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining police officers' response bias in judging veracity.
    Masip J; Herrero C
    Psicothema; 2017 Nov; 29(4):490-495. PubMed ID: 29048308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Intuitive" lie detection of children's deception by law enforcement officials and university students.
    Leach AM; Talwar V; Lee K; Bala N; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):661-85. PubMed ID: 15732652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statements about true and false intentions: using the Cognitive Interview to magnify the differences.
    Sooniste T; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Vrij A
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 56(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 25929812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies.
    Mann S; Vrij A; Bull R
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):137-49. PubMed ID: 14769126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Partners under Pressure: Examining the Consistency of True and False Alibi Statements.
    Sakrisvold ML; Granhag PA; Mac Giolla E
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 28247431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Police accuracy in truth/lie detection when judging baseline interviews.
    Caso L; Palena N; Carlessi E; Vrij A
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(6):841-850. PubMed ID: 32128012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How humans impair automated deception detection performance.
    Kleinberg B; Verschuere B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103250. PubMed ID: 33450692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of sketching while narrating on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Burkhardt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103236. PubMed ID: 33360343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Deeb H; Hope L; Mann S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103130. PubMed ID: 32683098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strong, but Wrong: Lay People's and Police Officers' Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception.
    Bogaard G; Meijer EH; Vrij A; Merckelbach H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156615. PubMed ID: 27258014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. T-Pattern Analysis and Cognitive Load Manipulation to Detect Low-Stake Lies: An Exploratory Study.
    Diana B; Zurloni V; Elia M; Cavalera C; Realdon O; Jonsson GK; Anguera MT
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():257. PubMed ID: 29551986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deception detection: interrogators' and observers' decoding of consecutive statements.
    Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 135(6):603-20. PubMed ID: 11931002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.