These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29355061)
1. The impact of maternal body mass index on external cephalic version success. Chaudhary S; Contag S; Yao R J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Jul; 32(13):2159-2165. PubMed ID: 29355061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years' experience. Melo P; Georgiou EX; Hedditch A; Ellaway P; Impey L BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 30223309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Success rate of external cephalic version in relation to the woman's body mass index and other factors-a population-based cohort study. Svensson E; Axelsson D; Nelson M; Nevander S; Blomberg M Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Dec; 100(12):2260-2267. PubMed ID: 34622950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. External cephalic version of non-cephalic presentation; is it worthwhile? Gottvall T; Ginstman C Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Dec; 90(12):1443-5. PubMed ID: 21682700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for caesarean section during trial of labor - a matched controlled study. Boujenah J; Fleury C; Bonneau C; Pharisien I; Tigaizin A; Carbillon L J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 46(10):737-742. PubMed ID: 28951278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012. Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Success rate and influencing factors of external cephalic version for singleton pregnancies in the third trimester]. Long JQ; Wei HW; Xia HW; Kong L; Song L; Yang QL; Qin YQ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):516-521. PubMed ID: 31461807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience. Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section. Hussin OA; Mahmoud MA; Abdel-Fattah MM East Mediterr Health J; 2013 Feb; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 23516827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Labour Outcomes After Successful External Cephalic Version Compared With Spontaneous Cephalic Version. Krueger S; Simioni J; Griffith LE; Hutton EK; J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jan; 40(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 28780214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery. Sela HY; Fiegenberg T; Ben-Meir A; Elchalal U; Ezra Y Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Feb; 142(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19019528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls. Balayla J; Dahdouh EM; Villeneuve S; Boucher M; Gauthier RJ; Audibert F; Fuchs F J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 24853490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery. Salzer L; Nagar R; Melamed N; Wiznitzer A; Peled Y; Yogev Y J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jan; 28(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 24593778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External cephalic version at term: A 6-year single-operator experience. Levin G; Rottenstreich A; Weill Y; Pollack RN Birth; 2019 Dec; 46(4):616-622. PubMed ID: 30941816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maternal body mass index and external cephalic version success rate - are they related? Jouzova A; Hruban L; Huptych M; Janku P; Polisenska M Ginekol Pol; 2021 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 33751516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation. de Gregorio N; Friedl T; Schramm A; Reister F; Janni W; Ebner F Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(5):477-481. PubMed ID: 28848185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland. Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery. Reinhard J; Sänger N; Hanker L; Reichenbach L; Yuan J; Herrmann E; Louwen F Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 23183715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses. Hutton EK; Simioni JC; Thabane L Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Aug; 96(8):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28449212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]