BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29355098)

  • 1. Perceptions of political leaders.
    David Schmitz J; Murray GR
    Politics Life Sci; 2017; 36(2):60-79. PubMed ID: 29355098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polarizing cues.
    Nicholson SP
    Am J Pol Sci; 2012; 56(1):52-66. PubMed ID: 22400143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mixed partisan households and electoral participation in the United States.
    Hersh E; Ghitza Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0203997. PubMed ID: 30303974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size, skills, and suffrage: Motivated distortions in perceived formidability of political leaders.
    Knapen JEP; Blaker NM; Pollet TV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0188485. PubMed ID: 29267275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Another issue comes out: gay rights policy voting in recent U.S. presidential elections.
    Rhodebeck LA
    J Homosex; 2015; 62(6):701-34. PubMed ID: 25530286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Political disagreement in intergroup terms: contextual variation and the influence of power.
    OBrien LV; McGarty C
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2009 Mar; 48(Pt 1):77-98. PubMed ID: 18445311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial models of political competition with endogenous political parties.
    Laver M; Schilperoord M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Sep; 362(1485):1711-21. PubMed ID: 17428772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolutionary preferences for physical formidability in leaders.
    Murray GR
    Politics Life Sci; 2014; 33(1):33-53. PubMed ID: 25514522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physiological responses and partisan bias: beyond self-reported measures of party identification.
    Petersen MB; Giessing A; Nielsen J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126922. PubMed ID: 26010527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Displays of emotion and citizen support for Merkel and Gysi.
    Gabriel OW; Masch L
    Politics Life Sci; 2017; 36(2):80-103. PubMed ID: 29355101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'.
    Darius P
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):151. PubMed ID: 36246430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Partisan self-interest is an important driver for people's support for the regulation of targeted political advertising.
    Baum K; Meissner S; Krasnova H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250506. PubMed ID: 33979358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Examination of Aggressive Beliefs and Attitudes in Relation to Political Affiliation and Candidate Endorsement in the United States.
    Michel JS; Bardeen JR
    J Psychol; 2019; 153(8):803-819. PubMed ID: 31188715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The transformative and informative nature of elections: Representation, schism, and exit.
    Gaffney AM; Sherburne B; Hackett JD; Rast DE; Hohman ZP
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Jan; 58(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 30221774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motivated independence? Implicit party identity predicts political judgments among self-proclaimed Independents.
    Hawkins CB; Nosek BA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1437-52. PubMed ID: 22875789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partisanship and the Pandemic: How and Why Americans Followed Party Cues on COVID-19.
    Mehlhaff ID; Tarillo MC; Vanegas A; Hetherington MJ
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2024 Jun; 49(3):351-374. PubMed ID: 37988071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The political system through a partisan lens: Within-person changes in support for political parties precede political system attitudes.
    Satherley N; Osborne D; Sibley CG
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2023 Jan; 62(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 36251586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social identification among political party voters and members: an empirical test of optimal distinctiveness theory.
    Van Hiel A; Mervielde I
    J Soc Psychol; 2002 Apr; 142(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 11999872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans' support for partisan violence.
    Mernyk JS; Pink SL; Druckman JN; Willer R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Apr; 119(16):e2116851119. PubMed ID: 35412915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.