117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29355450)
1. Dual composite reference standards (dCRS) in molecular diagnostic research: A new approach to reduce bias in the presence of Imperfect reference.
Tang S; Hemyari P; Canchola JA; Duncan J
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(5):951-965. PubMed ID: 29355450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneous alleviation of verification and reference standard biases in a community-based tuberculosis screening study using Bayesian latent class analysis.
Keter AK; Vanobberghen F; Lynen L; Van Heerden A; Fehr J; Olivier S; Wong EB; Glass TR; Reither K; Goetghebeur E; Jacobs BKM
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0305126. PubMed ID: 38857227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test.
Alonzo TA; Pepe MS
Stat Med; 1999 Nov; 18(22):2987-3003. PubMed ID: 10544302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis.
Hadgu A
Lancet; 1996 Aug; 348(9027):592-3. PubMed ID: 8774575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian latent class analysis when the reference test is imperfect.
Cheung A; Dufour S; Jones G; Kostoulas P; Stevenson MA; Singanallur NB; Firestone SM
Rev Sci Tech; 2021 Jun; 40(1):271-286. PubMed ID: 34140724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bias in discrepant analysis: when two wrongs don't make a right.
Miller WC
J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Mar; 51(3):219-31. PubMed ID: 9495687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.
Storey HL; Huang Y; Crudder C; Golden A; de los Santos T; Hawkins K
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142364. PubMed ID: 26566275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Different latent class models were used and evaluated for assessing the accuracy of campylobacter diagnostic tests: overcoming imperfect reference standards?
Asselineau J; Paye A; Bessède E; Perez P; Proust-Lima C
Epidemiol Infect; 2018 Sep; 146(12):1556-1564. PubMed ID: 29945689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect reference standard - a comparison of correction methods.
Umemneku Chikere CM; Wilson KJ; Allen AJ; Vale L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 33845775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard.
Hawkins DM; Garrett JA; Stephenson B
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1987-2001. PubMed ID: 11427955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
Walsh T
J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of screening tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis: bias associated with the patient-infected-status algorithm.
Hadgu A; Dendukuri N; Wang L
Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 22157304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinically Adjudicated Reference Standards for Evaluation of Infectious Diseases Diagnostics.
Patel R; Tsalik EL; Evans S; Fowler VG; Doernberg SB;
Clin Infect Dis; 2023 Mar; 76(5):938-943. PubMed ID: 36262037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.
Valenstein PN
Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 93(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 2405632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Latent Class Analysis: Insights about design and analysis of schistosomiasis diagnostic studies.
Koukounari A; Jamil H; Erosheva E; Shiff C; Moustaki I
PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2021 Feb; 15(2):e0009042. PubMed ID: 33539357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
Collins J; Huynh M
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Biases in diagnostic test studies: impact on estimating sensitivity and specificity].
Rendón-Macías ME; Valenzuela M; Villasís-Keever MÁ
Rev Alerg Mex; 2020; 67(2):165-173. PubMed ID: 32892530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
