298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29355920)
1. Testing the Impact of Mixed-Mode Designs (Mail and Web) and Multiple Contact Attempts within Mode (Mail or Web) on Clinician Survey Response.
Beebe TJ; Jacobson RM; Jenkins SM; Lackore KA; Rutten LJF
Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):3070-3083. PubMed ID: 29355920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.
Beebe TJ; Locke GR; Barnes SA; Davern ME; Anderson KJ
Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. PubMed ID: 17489911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-rated health assessed by web versus mail modes in a mixed mode survey: the digital divide effect and the genuine survey mode effect.
Shim JM; Shin E; Johnson TP
Med Care; 2013 Sep; 51(9):774-81. PubMed ID: 23774510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study.
Mauz E; Hoffmann R; Houben R; Krause L; Kamtsiuris P; Gößwald A
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e64. PubMed ID: 29506967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Self-reported data in environmental health studies: mail vs. web-based surveys.
Cantuaria ML; Blanes-Vidal V
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):238. PubMed ID: 31830906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of administration mode on CAHPS survey response rates and results: A comparison of mail and web-based approaches.
Fowler FJ; Cosenza C; Cripps LA; Edgman-Levitan S; Cleary PD
Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 54(3):714-721. PubMed ID: 30656646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: a comparison of mail, web and telephone approaches.
Link MW; Mokdad AH
J Stud Alcohol; 2005 Mar; 66(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 15957675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and U.S. mail.
McCabe SE; Boyd CJ; Couper MP; Crawford S; D'Arcy H
J Stud Alcohol; 2002 Nov; 63(6):755-61. PubMed ID: 12529076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing web and mail responses in a mixed mode survey in college alcohol use research.
McCabe SE; Diez A; Boyd CJ; Nelson TF; Weitzman ER
Addict Behav; 2006 Sep; 31(9):1619-27. PubMed ID: 16460882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating patients' experiences with individual physicians: a randomized trial of mail, internet, and interactive voice response telephone administration of surveys.
Rodriguez HP; von Glahn T; Rogers WH; Chang H; Fanjiang G; Safran DG
Med Care; 2006 Feb; 44(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16434916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of survey mode on the response rate in a survey of the factors that influence Minnesota physicians' disclosure practices.
Weaver L; Beebe TJ; Rockwood T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):73. PubMed ID: 30940087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.
Ernst SA; Brand T; Lhachimi SK; Zeeb H
Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):879-895. PubMed ID: 28217941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative modes for health surveillance surveys: an experiment with web, mail, and telephone.
Link MW; Mokdad AH
Epidemiology; 2005 Sep; 16(5):701-4. PubMed ID: 16135951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.
McHorney CA; Kosinski M; Ware JE
Med Care; 1994 Jun; 32(6):551-67. PubMed ID: 8189774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Web and mail surveys for studying secondary consequences associated with substance use: evidence for minimal mode effects.
McCabe SE; Couper MP; Cranford JA; Boyd CJ
Addict Behav; 2006 Jan; 31(1):162-8. PubMed ID: 15916862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
Westrick SC; Mount JK
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combining web-based and mail surveys improves response rates: a PBRN study from PRIME Net.
Kroth PJ; McPherson L; Leverence R; Pace W; Daniels E; Rhyne RL; Williams RL;
Ann Fam Med; 2009; 7(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19433842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
