103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29356845)
1. Risk of Subsequent Fragility Fractures Observed After Low-Trauma Ankle Fractures.
Roux S; Cabana F; Carrier N; Beaulieu MC; Boire G
Calcif Tissue Int; 2018 Jul; 103(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 29356845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) underestimates incident and recurrent fractures in consecutive patients with fragility fractures.
Roux S; Cabana F; Carrier N; Beaulieu M; April PM; Beaulieu MC; Boire G
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2014 Jul; 99(7):2400-8. PubMed ID: 24780062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recurrent Fragility Fractures: A Cross-sectional Analysis.
Dang DY; Zetumer S; Zhang AL
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2019 Jan; 27(2):e85-e91. PubMed ID: 30169444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency of FRAX risk factors in osteopenic postmenopausal women with and without history of fragility fracture.
Baró F; Cano A; Sánchez Borrego R; Ferrer J; González Rodríguez SP; Neyro JL; Rodriguez Bueno E; Sancho C; Inaraja V; Fernández C; Corral C;
Menopause; 2012 Nov; 19(11):1193-9. PubMed ID: 22948137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.
Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM;
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of osteoporotic fractures in the group of woman over 50 years of age--comparison of tools FRAX BMD versus FRAX BMI].
Strugala C; Sobala W; Szubert Z; Hanke W
Med Pr; 2013; 64(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24261246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epidemiology of Adult Ankle Fractures: 1756 cases identified in Norrbotten County during 2009-2013 and classified according to AO/OTA.
Juto H; Nilsson H; Morberg P
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Dec; 19(1):441. PubMed ID: 30545314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture risk prediction in outpatients from Krakow Region using FRAX tool versus fracture risk in 11-year follow-up.
Czerwiński E; Borowy P; Kumorek A; Amarowicz J; Górkiewicz M; Milert A
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2013; 15(6):617-28. PubMed ID: 24662908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women with diabetes: comparison between DeFRA and FRAX tools.
Bonaccorsi G; Messina C; Cervellati C; Maietti E; Medini M; Rossini M; Massari L; Greco P
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2018 May; 34(5):404-408. PubMed ID: 29172781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low-trauma ankle fractures in Brazil: secular trends in patients over 50 years old from 2004 to 2013.
Silva ARB; Martinez LC; Pinheiro MM; Szejnfeld VL
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jul; 15(1):105. PubMed ID: 32700025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX.
Kälvesten J; Lui LY; Brismar T; Cummings S
Bone; 2016 May; 86():30-5. PubMed ID: 26921822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of previous falls in major osteoporotic fracture prediction in conjunction with FRAX in older Chinese men and women: the Mr. OS and Ms. OS cohort study in Hong Kong.
Su Y; Leung J; Kwok T
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Feb; 29(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 29067485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Serum Levels of a Cathepsin-K Generated Periostin Fragment Predict Incident Low-Trauma Fractures in Postmenopausal Women Independently of BMD and FRAX.
Bonnet N; Biver E; Chevalley T; Rizzoli R; Garnero P; Ferrari SL
J Bone Miner Res; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2232-2238. PubMed ID: 28766739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence of hip fracture in Brazil and the development of a FRAX model.
Zerbini CA; Szejnfeld VL; Abergaria BH; McCloskey EV; Johansson H; Kanis JA
Arch Osteoporos; 2015; 10():224. PubMed ID: 26303038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FRAX for fracture prediction shorter and longer than 10 years: the Manitoba BMD registry.
Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Morin SN; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Sep; 28(9):2557-2564. PubMed ID: 28593449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FRAX-based intervention and assessment thresholds in seven Latin American countries.
Clark P; Denova-Gutiérrez E; Zerbini C; Sanchez A; Messina O; Jaller JJ; Campusano C; Orces CH; Riera G; Johansson H; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Mar; 29(3):707-715. PubMed ID: 29273826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The characteristics of osteoporotic fractures in the region of Bialystok (BOS-2). The application of the WHO algorithm, FRAX®BMI and FRAX®BMD assessment tools to determine patients for intervention.
Badurski J; Jeziernicka E; Dobreńko A; Nowak N; Daniluk S; Rybaczuk M; Wiśniowiecka M
Endokrynol Pol; 2011; 62(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 21879467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidence of bone protection and associated fragility injuries in patients with proximal femur fractures.
Aguado-Maestro I; Panteli M; García-Alonso M; Bañuelos-Díaz A; Giannoudis PV
Injury; 2017 Dec; 48 Suppl 7():S27-S33. PubMed ID: 28851521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Probability of fractures predicted by FRAX® and observed incidence in the Spanish ECOSAP Study cohort.
González-Macías J; Marin F; Vila J; Díez-Pérez A
Bone; 2012 Jan; 50(1):373-7. PubMed ID: 22129640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using a sequential explanatory mixed method to evaluate the therapeutic window of opportunity for initiating osteoporosis treatment following fragility fractures.
Roux S; Gaboury I; Gionet-Landry N; Garant MP; Beaulieu MC; Carrier N; Cabana F; Boire G
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Apr; 29(4):961-971. PubMed ID: 29445831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
