BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29356873)

  • 1. Clinical outcomes and costs of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes: a prospective cohort study.
    Mager R; Kurosch M; Höfner T; Frees S; Haferkamp A; Neisius A
    Urolithiasis; 2018 Nov; 46(6):587-593. PubMed ID: 29356873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
    Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
    J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
    Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
    J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.
    Martin CJ; McAdams SB; Abdul-Muhsin H; Lim VM; Nunez-Nateras R; Tyson MD; Humphreys MR
    J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):730-735. PubMed ID: 27693449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices.
    Marchini GS; Torricelli FC; Batagello CA; Monga M; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):658-670. PubMed ID: 31397987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.
    Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A
    J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.
    Usawachintachit M; Isaacson DS; Taguchi K; Tzou DT; Hsi RS; Sherer BA; Stoller ML; Chi T
    J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28287823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
    Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R
    Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decreasing cost of flexible ureterorenoscopy: single-use laser fiber cost analysis.
    Chapman RA; Somani BK; Robertson A; Healy S; Kata SG
    Urology; 2014 May; 83(5):1003-5. PubMed ID: 24529588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fiberoptic versus Digital: A Comparison of Durability and Cost Effectiveness of the Two Flexible Ureteroscopes.
    Temiz MZ; Colakerol A; Ertas K; Tuken M; Yuruk E
    Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):181-186. PubMed ID: 30463076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Steep Infundibulopelvic Angle as a New Risk Factor for Flexible Ureteroscope Damage and Complicated Postoperative Course.
    Ozimek T; Cordes J; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Gilbert N; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
    J Endourol; 2018 Jul; 32(7):597-602. PubMed ID: 29737199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes.
    Al-Balushi K; Martin N; Loubon H; Baboudjian M; Michel F; Sichez PC; Martin T; Di-Crocco E; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Akiki A; Faure A; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Oct; 51(10):1735-1741. PubMed ID: 31317310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining the Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope Reprocessing Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing.
    Isaacson D; Ahmad T; Metzler I; Tzou DT; Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Zetumer S; Sherer B; Stoller M; Chi T
    J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1026-1031. PubMed ID: 28830223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?
    Göger YE; Özkent MS; Kılınç MT; Taşkapu HH; Göger E; Aydın A; Sönmez MG; Karalezli G
    World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3643-3650. PubMed ID: 33738574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reusable, Single-Use, or Both: A Cost Efficiency Analysis of Flexible Ureterorenoscopes After 983 Cases.
    Van Compernolle D; Veys R; Elshout PJ; Beysens M; Van Haute C; De Groote L; Tailly T
    J Endourol; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1454-1459. PubMed ID: 33775101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
    Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
    J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of pre- and post-surgical images of reusable and single use flexible ureteroscopes: a qualitative analysis.
    Domenech A; Alliende C; Vivaldi B; Pizzi P
    Cent European J Urol; 2021; 74(3):459-463. PubMed ID: 34729238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-use versus reusable ureterorenoscopes for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): systematic comparative analysis of physical and optical properties in three different devices.
    Deininger S; Haberstock L; Kruck S; Neumann E; da Costa IA; Todenhöfer T; Bedke J; Stenzl A; Rausch S
    World J Urol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2059-2063. PubMed ID: 29869701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Do They Compare with Reusable Ureteroscopes?
    Scotland KB; Chan JYH; Chew BH
    J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 30612446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.