These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29356920)

  • 41. Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery by a CAD/CAM and laser scanning technique.
    Zhao XZ; Xu WH; Tang ZH; Wu MJ; Zhu J; Chen S
    Chin J Dent Res; 2014; 17(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 25028687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants, after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates--a method reducing patient radiation exposure (part I).
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 38(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 19939692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
    Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted Implant Planning and Placement in Partially Edentulous Patients. Part 4: Accuracy of Implant Placement.
    Schneider D; Sancho-Puchades M; Mir-Marí J; Mühlemann S; Jung R; Hämmerle C
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(4):e111-e122. PubMed ID: 31226190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accuracy evaluation of computer-guided implant surgery associated with prototyped surgical guides.
    Cunha RM; Souza FÁ; Hadad H; Poli PP; Maiorana C; Carvalho PSP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 32111393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Factors that Influence Direction Deviation in Freehand Implant Placement.
    Tang T; Huang Z; Liao L; Gu X; Zhang J; Zhang X
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):511-518. PubMed ID: 30994948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible.
    Cassetta M; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Stefanelli LV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1071-8. PubMed ID: 25216132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy of dental implant placement with 3D-printed surgical templates by using Implant Studio and MGUIDE. An observational study.
    Fotopoulos I; Lillis T; Panagiotidou E; Kapagiannidis I; Nazaroglou I; Dabarakis N
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Sep; 25(3):249-256. PubMed ID: 35072419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of restoratively projected and surgically acceptable virtual implant position for mandibular overdentures.
    Scarfe W; Vaughn WS; Farman AG; Harris BT; Paris MM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 22299087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery for completely edentulous patients. A proof of a concept.
    Pomares-Puig C; Sánchez-Garcés MA; Jorba-García A
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104443. PubMed ID: 36720424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
    Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of static fully guided implant placement in the posterior area of partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study.
    Gargallo-Albiol J; Zilleruelo-Pozo MJ; Lucas-Taulé E; Muñoz-Peñalver J; Paternostro-Betancourt D; Hernandez-Alfaro F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2783-2791. PubMed ID: 34782925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
    Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
    D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients.
    Younes F; Cosyn J; De Bruyckere T; Cleymaet R; Bouckaert E; Eghbali A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Jun; 45(6):721-732. PubMed ID: 29608793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Predictably replacing maxillary incisors with implants using 3-D planning and guided implant surgery.
    Wöhrle PS
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):758-62, 764-6, 768. PubMed ID: 25454529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implant placement using a novel nonradiologic evaluation method.
    Schnutenhaus S; Edelmann C; Rudolph H; Luthardt RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Apr; 121(4):e72-9. PubMed ID: 26972545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.