These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2935736)

  • 1. The Baby Doe rules.
    Angell M
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Mar; 314(10):642-4. PubMed ID: 2935736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Baby Doe controversy.
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Sep; 315(11):707-8. PubMed ID: 3748076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The legal response to Babies Doe: an analytical prognosis.
    Rosenblum VG; Grant ER
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 3636287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An introduction to the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc.
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 2931397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme Court asked to review application of Rehabilitation Act to medical decisions.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 2931399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations.
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When parents refuse treatment for children.
    Gerber PC
    Physicians Manage; 1984 Sep; 24(9):114-6, 121, 124 passim. PubMed ID: 10317507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 'Baby Doe' thrusts administrators into middle of life-death decision.
    Punch L; Simler SL
    Mod Healthc; 1982 Jul; 12(7):72-4. PubMed ID: 10317219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Whatever happened to Baby Doe?
    Vernon J
    Neonatal Netw; 1998 Mar; 17(2):73-4. PubMed ID: 9592503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court decisions and the feds: travesty or tragedy?
    Curtin LL
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 6212784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perspectives. Baby Doe reconsidered.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Jan; 38(3):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10317416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perspectives. The continuing saga of Baby Doe.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Aug; 38(32):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10317510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The federal role in protecting Babies Doe.
    Gerry MH; Nimz M
    Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):339-77. PubMed ID: 2954927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reagan Administration revises "Baby Doe" regulations.
    Iglehart JK
    Hosp Prog; 1984 Feb; 65(2):17, 20. PubMed ID: 10317422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Final judgment issued in case challenging Baby Doe regulations.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Baby Doe five years later.
    N Engl J Med; 1988 Feb; 318(5):321-2. PubMed ID: 2961995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AHA files brief in U.S. Supreme Court in "Baby Doe" case.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Nov; 8(23):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Backsliding on "Baby Doe"?
    Med World News; 1985 Mar; 26(5):11, 15. PubMed ID: 10317572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The final, anticlimactic rule on Baby Doe.
    Murray TH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Jun; 15(3):5-9. PubMed ID: 4019172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 'Baby Doe' regulation still agitates with revision 3.
    Med World News; 1984 Feb; 25(3):14-5. PubMed ID: 10317427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.