These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29358532)

  • 21. The effect of prophylaxis method on microtensile bond strength of indirect restorations to dentin.
    Soares CJ; Pereira JC; Souza SJ; Menezes MS; Armstrong SR
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 22616925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of Surface Sealants and Polishing Time on Composite Surface Roughness and Microhardness.
    Ruschel VC; Bona VS; Baratieri LN; Maia HP
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(4):408-415. PubMed ID: 29630480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations.
    Venturini D; Cenci MS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 16536188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Air-polishing technology is an effective alternative chairside method for cleaning dentures.
    Gunawan V; Carrington SD; Choi YJ; Choi JJE
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2024 Aug; 22(3):626-638. PubMed ID: 37680139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth-coloured restoratives.
    Yap AU; Sau CW; Lye KW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jun; 25(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 9687119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resins.
    Moda MD; Godas AGL; Fernandes JC; Suzuki TYU; Guedes APA; Briso ALF; Bedran-Russo AK; Dos Santos PH
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Feb; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 28762671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Kulunk S; Ural C; Kulunk T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 16872928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of polishing pastes on composite resin surfaces. A SEM study.
    Serio FG; Strassler HE; Litkowski LJ; Moffitt WC; Krupa CM
    J Periodontol; 1988 Dec; 59(12):837-40. PubMed ID: 3225731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of prophylactic powders on the surface roughness of enamel.
    Fratolin MM; Bianco VC; Santos MJ; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014 Oct; 35(9):e31-5. PubMed ID: 25612331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of three prophylaxis methods on surface roughness of giomer.
    Kimyai S; Savadi-Oskoee S; Ajami AA; Sadr A; Asdagh S
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2011 Jan; 16(1):e110-4. PubMed ID: 20711162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites.
    Gönülol N; Yilmaz F
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e64-70. PubMed ID: 22819955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Nanocomposites.
    Alfawaz Y
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):647-651. PubMed ID: 28816183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surface Roughness of Methacrylate- and Silorane-Based Composites After Finishing and Polishing Procedures.
    Santos MJ; Rêgo HMC; Linares L; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2017; 38(10):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 29140098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surface roughness of various packable composites.
    Ryba TM; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 12022454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can Reduced-Step Polishers Be as Effective as Multiple-Step Polishers in Enhancing Surface Smoothness?
    Kemaloglu H; Karacolak G; Turkun LS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Feb; 29(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 27393008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.
    Paravina RD; Roeder L; Lu H; Vogel K; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15478488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.