BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29359193)

  • 1. Ecological Stability Properties of Microbial Communities Assessed by Flow Cytometry.
    Liu Z; Cichocki N; Bonk F; Günther S; Schattenberg F; Harms H; Centler F; Müller S
    mSphere; 2018; 3(1):. PubMed ID: 29359193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Personalized microbiome dynamics - Cytometric fingerprints for routine diagnostics.
    Koch C; Müller S
    Mol Aspects Med; 2018 Feb; 59():123-134. PubMed ID: 28669592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of microbial disturbances in a drinking water microbial community through continuous acquisition and advanced analysis of flow cytometry data.
    Props R; Rubbens P; Besmer M; Buysschaert B; Sigrist J; Weilenmann H; Waegeman W; Boon N; Hammes F
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 145():73-82. PubMed ID: 30121434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrating Ecological and Engineering Concepts of Resilience in Microbial Communities.
    Song HS; Renslow RS; Fredrickson JK; Lindemann SR
    Front Microbiol; 2015; 6():1298. PubMed ID: 26648912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting the Presence and Abundance of Bacterial Taxa in Environmental Communities through Flow Cytometric Fingerprinting.
    Heyse J; Schattenberg F; Rubbens P; Müller S; Waegeman W; Boon N; Props R
    mSystems; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0055121. PubMed ID: 34546074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying long-term plant community dynamics with movement models: implications for ecological resilience.
    Bagchi S; Singh NJ; Briske DD; Bestelmeyer BT; McClaran MP; Murthy K
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jul; 27(5):1514-1528. PubMed ID: 28370777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel high-throughput multi-parameter flow cytometry based method for monitoring and rapid characterization of microbiome dynamics in anaerobic systems.
    Dhoble AS; Bekal S; Dolatowski W; Yanz C; Lambert KN; Bhalerao KD
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 220():566-571. PubMed ID: 27614579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ecological consequences of bacterioplankton lifestyles: changes in concepts are needed.
    Grossart HP
    Environ Microbiol Rep; 2010 Dec; 2(6):706-14. PubMed ID: 23766274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resolution of natural microbial community dynamics by community fingerprinting, flow cytometry, and trend interpretation analysis.
    Bombach P; Hübschmann T; Fetzer I; Kleinsteuber S; Geyer R; Harms H; Müller S
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2011; 124():151-81. PubMed ID: 21072701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PhenoGMM: Gaussian Mixture Modeling of Cytometry Data Quantifies Changes in Microbial Community Structure.
    Rubbens P; Props R; Kerckhof FM; Boon N; Waegeman W
    mSphere; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33536320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High resolution single cell analytics to follow microbial community dynamics in anaerobic ecosystems.
    Müller S; Hübschmann T; Kleinsteuber S; Vogt C
    Methods; 2012 Jul; 57(3):338-49. PubMed ID: 22504724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Engineering temporal dynamics in microbial communities.
    Ronda C; Wang HH
    Curr Opin Microbiol; 2022 Feb; 65():47-55. PubMed ID: 34739926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microbial Community Cohesion Mediates Community Turnover in Unperturbed Aquifers.
    Danczak RE; Johnston MD; Kenah C; Slattery M; Wilkins MJ
    mSystems; 2018; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 29984314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics - Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities.
    Lambrecht J; Schattenberg F; Harms H; Mueller S
    J Vis Exp; 2018 Jul; (137):. PubMed ID: 30059034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fundamentals of microbial community resistance and resilience.
    Shade A; Peter H; Allison SD; Baho DL; Berga M; Bürgmann H; Huber DH; Langenheder S; Lennon JT; Martiny JB; Matulich KL; Schmidt TM; Handelsman J
    Front Microbiol; 2012; 3():417. PubMed ID: 23267351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stabilizing microbial communities by looped mass transfer.
    Li S; Abdulkadir N; Schattenberg F; Nunes da Rocha U; Grimm V; Müller S; Liu Z
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Apr; 119(17):e2117814119. PubMed ID: 35446625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconciling Ecological and Engineering Design Principles for Building Microbiomes.
    Bernstein HC
    mSystems; 2019 May; 4(3):. PubMed ID: 31138720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterizing mixed microbial population dynamics using time-series analysis.
    Trosvik P; Rudi K; Naes T; Kohler A; Chan KS; Jakobsen KS; Stenseth NC
    ISME J; 2008 Jul; 2(7):707-15. PubMed ID: 18385770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.