BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29359484)

  • 1. Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading.
    Egevad L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Cheville J; Comperat E; Evans AJ; Fine SW; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Hörnblad J; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; Leite KRM; Magi-Galluzzi C; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; True LD; Tsuzuki T; van der Kwast T; Varma M; Zhou M; Clements M
    Histopathology; 2018 Jul; 73(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 29359484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pathology Imagebase-a reference image database for standardization of pathology.
    Egevad L; Cheville J; Evans AJ; Hörnblad J; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; Leite KRM; Magi-Galluzzi C; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; True L; Zhou M; Clements M; Delahunt B;
    Histopathology; 2017 Nov; 71(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28722802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.
    Egevad L; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Samaratunga H
    APMIS; 2016 Jun; 124(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 27150257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
    Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
    Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
    Egevad L; Ahmad AS; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Griffiths D; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Moss S; Oliveira P; Vainer B; Varma M; Camparo P
    Histopathology; 2013 Jan; 62(2):247-56. PubMed ID: 23240715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.
    Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Gianduzzo T; Coughlin G; Duffy D; LeFevre I; Johannsen S; Egevad L; Yaxley J
    Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 26325670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of areas of grading difficulties in prostate cancer and comparison with artificial intelligence assisted grading.
    Egevad L; Swanberg D; Delahunt B; Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; van der Kwast T; Varma M; Zhou M; Clements M; Eklund M
    Virchows Arch; 2020 Dec; 477(6):777-786. PubMed ID: 32542445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
    Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
    Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution, controversies and the future of prostate cancer grading.
    Egevad L; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Samaratunga H
    Pathol Int; 2019 Feb; 69(2):55-66. PubMed ID: 30694570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
    Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists.
    Berney DM; Algaba F; Camparo P; Compérat E; Griffiths D; Kristiansen G; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Varma M; Egevad L
    Histopathology; 2014 Feb; 64(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 24102975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
    Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading.
    Flach RN; Egevad L; Eklund M; van der Kwast TH; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Suelmann BBM; Willemse PM; Meijer RP; van Diest PJ
    J Clin Pathol; 2023 Dec; 77(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 36328436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading for prostatic adenocarcinoma in thin core biopsies using TROG 03.04 'RADAR' trial clinical data.
    Delahunt B; Egevad L; Srigley JR; Steigler A; Murray JD; Atkinson C; Matthews J; Duchesne G; Spry NA; Christie D; Joseph D; Attia J; Denham JW
    Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 26325671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
    Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    van Leenders GJLH; van der Kwast TH; Grignon DJ; Evans AJ; Kristiansen G; Kweldam CF; Litjens G; McKenney JK; Melamed J; Mottet N; Paner GP; Samaratunga H; Schoots IG; Simko JP; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Warren AY; Wheeler TM; Williamson SR; Iczkowski KA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Aug; 44(8):e87-e99. PubMed ID: 32459716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of central pathology review of prostatic biopsies in a contemporary series from a phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SHIP0804).
    Sasaki H; Kido M; Miki K; Aoki M; Takahashi H; Dokiya T; Yamanaka H; Fukushima M; Egawa S
    Pathol Int; 2015 Apr; 65(4):177-82. PubMed ID: 25707702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
    Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Impact of International Association of Urological Pathology Gleason scoring system on prostatic carcinoma grading: a preliminary analysis of 185 cases].
    Wang G; Shen D
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 43(10):677-9. PubMed ID: 25567594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.