BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29359705)

  • 1. A dual caudal-fin miniature robotic fish with an integrated oscillation and jet propulsive mechanism.
    Liao P; Zhang S; Sun D
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2018 Mar; 13(3):036007. PubMed ID: 29359705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolutionary multiobjective design of a flexible caudal fin for robotic fish.
    Clark AJ; Tan X; McKinley PK
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2015 Nov; 10(6):065006. PubMed ID: 26601975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding Fish Linear Acceleration Using an Undulatory Biorobotic Model with Soft Fluidic Elastomer Actuated Morphing Median Fins.
    Wen L; Ren Z; Di Santo V; Hu K; Yuan T; Wang T; Lauder GV
    Soft Robot; 2018 Aug; 5(4):375-388. PubMed ID: 29634444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hydrodynamics of a robotic fish tail: effects of the caudal peduncle, fin ray motions and the flow speed.
    Ren Z; Yang X; Wang T; Wen L
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2016 Feb; 11(1):016008. PubMed ID: 26855405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechatronic design and locomotion control of a robotic thunniform swimmer for fast cruising.
    Hu Y; Liang J; Wang T
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2015 Mar; 10(2):026006. PubMed ID: 25822708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a bio-inspired transformable robotic fin.
    Yang Y; Xia Y; Qin F; Xu M; Li W; Zhang S
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2016 Aug; 11(5):056010. PubMed ID: 27580003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parametric study of the swimming performance of a fish robot propelled by a flexible caudal fin.
    Low KH; Chong CW
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2010 Dec; 5(4):046002. PubMed ID: 21068469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Propulsive performance of an under-actuated robotic ribbon fin.
    Liu H; Curet OM
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2017 Jun; 12(3):036015. PubMed ID: 28481218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Note: Dynamic analysis of a robotic fish motion with a caudal fin with vertical phase differences.
    Yun D; Kim KS; Kim S; Kyung J; Lee S
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 Mar; 84(3):036108. PubMed ID: 23556860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bio-inspired aquatic robotics by untethered piezohydroelastic actuation.
    Cen L; Erturk A
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2013 Mar; 8(1):016006. PubMed ID: 23348365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling of a biologically inspired robotic fish driven by compliant parts.
    El Daou H; Salumäe T; Chambers LD; Megill WM; Kruusmaa M
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2014 Mar; 9(1):016010. PubMed ID: 24451164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal chordwise stiffness profiles of self-propelled flapping fins.
    Kancharala AK; Philen MK
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2016 Sep; 11(5):056016. PubMed ID: 27627992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting propulsive forces using distributed sensors in a compliant, high DOF, robotic fin.
    Kahn JC; Peretz DJ; Tangorra JL
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2015 May; 10(3):036009. PubMed ID: 25985056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of caudal fin flexibility on the propulsive efficiency of a fish-like swimmer.
    Bergmann M; Iollo A; Mittal R
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2014 Sep; 9(4):046001. PubMed ID: 25252883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding undulatory locomotion in fishes using an inertia-compensated flapping foil robotic device.
    Wen L; Lauder G
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2013 Dec; 8(4):046013. PubMed ID: 24263114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bottom-level motion control for robotic fish to swim in groups: modeling and experiments.
    Li L; Liu A; Wang W; Ravi S; Fu R; Yu J; Xie G
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2019 May; 14(4):046001. PubMed ID: 30875698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical model of batoid (skates and rays) pectoral fins predicts the influence of skeletal structure on fin kinematics: implications for bio-inspired design.
    Russo RS; Blemker SS; Fish FE; Bart-Smith H
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2015 Jun; 10(4):046002. PubMed ID: 26079094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multi-body dynamics based numerical modelling tool for solving aquatic biomimetic problems.
    Li R; Xiao Q; Liu Y; Hu J; Li L; Li G; Liu H; Hu K; Wen L
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2018 Jul; 13(5):056001. PubMed ID: 29916395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Passive robotic models of propulsion by the bodies and caudal fins of fish.
    Lauder GV; Flammang B; Alben S
    Integr Comp Biol; 2012 Nov; 52(5):576-87. PubMed ID: 22740513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bending continuous structures with SMAs: a novel robotic fish design.
    Rossi C; Colorado J; Coral W; Barrientos A
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2011 Dec; 6(4):045005. PubMed ID: 22126900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.