These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29360687)

  • 1. Deep Learning-Based Noise Reduction Approach to Improve Speech Intelligibility for Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Lai YH; Tsao Y; Lu X; Chen F; Su YT; Chen KC; Chen YH; Chen LC; Po-Hung Li L; Lee CH
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):795-809. PubMed ID: 29360687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Deep Denoising Autoencoder Approach to Improving the Intelligibility of Vocoded Speech in Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Lai YH; Chen F; Wang SS; Lu X; Tsao Y; Lee CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Jul; 64(7):1568-1578. PubMed ID: 28113304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of noise reduction methods for sentence recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant listeners.
    Chen F; Hu Y; Yuan M
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 25127321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved Environment-Aware-Based Noise Reduction System for Cochlear Implant Users Based on a Knowledge Transfer Approach: Development and Usability Study.
    Li LP; Han JY; Zheng WZ; Huang RJ; Lai YH
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e25460. PubMed ID: 34709193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conversion of adult Nucleus® 5 cochlear implant users to the Nucleus® 6 system.
    De Ceulaer G; Swinnen F; Pascoal D; Philips B; Killian M; James C; Govaerts PJ; Dhooge I
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jul; 16(4):222-32. PubMed ID: 25284643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early prelingual auditory development and speech perception at 1-year follow-up in Mandarin-speaking children after cochlear implantation.
    Zheng Y; Soli SD; Tao Y; Xu K; Meng Z; Li G; Wang K; Zheng H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Nov; 75(11):1418-26. PubMed ID: 21893351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
    Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Busby PA; Arora K
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Within-Talker Variability on Speech Intelligibility in Mandarin-Speaking Adult and Pediatric Cochlear Implant Patients.
    Su Q; Galvin JJ; Zhang G; Li Y; Fu QJ
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27363714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech Recognition in Noise in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology.
    Wesarg T; Arndt S; Wiebe K; Schmid F; Huber A; Mülder HE; Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Speck I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):607-618. PubMed ID: 30430986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of Individual Cochlear Implant Recipient Speech Perception With the Output Signal to Noise Ratio Metric.
    Watkins GD; Swanson BA; Suaning GJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1270-1281. PubMed ID: 32053546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM.
    Wolfe J; Schafer EC; Heldner B; Mülder H; Ward E; Vincent B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):409-21. PubMed ID: 19928395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spoken word recognition in noise in Mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Ren C; Yang J; Zha D; Lin Y; Liu H; Kong Y; Liu S; Xu L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 113():124-130. PubMed ID: 30173970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving Hearing Performance for Cochlear Implant Recipients with Use of a Digital, Wireless, Remote-Microphone, Audio-Streaming Accessory.
    Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 26134720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children.
    Hwang CF; Chen HC; Yang CH; Peng JP; Weng CH
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 21982716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.