BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29361245)

  • 1. Brain Gliomas: Multicenter Standardized Assessment of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MR Images.
    Anzalone N; Castellano A; Cadioli M; Conte GM; Cuccarini V; Bizzi A; Grimaldi M; Costa A; Grillea G; Vitali P; Aquino D; Terreni MR; Torri V; Erickson BJ; Caulo M
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):933-943. PubMed ID: 29361245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.
    Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) vs. dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated high-grade gliomas.
    Zakhari N; Taccone MS; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Sinclair J; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Cron GO; Thornhill RE; McInnes MDF; Nguyen TB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):573-582. PubMed ID: 30614146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Values of DCE-MRI and DSC-MRI for Differentiation Between High-grade and Low-grade Gliomas: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.
    Liang J; Liu D; Gao P; Zhang D; Chen H; Shi C; Luo L
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 29223713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differentiation of High-Grade from Low-Grade Astrocytoma: Improvement in Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of Pharmacokinetic Parameters from DCE MR Imaging by Using Arterial Input Functions Obtained from DSC MR Imaging.
    You SH; Choi SH; Kim TM; Park CK; Park SH; Won JK; Kim IH; Lee ST; Choi HJ; Yoo RE; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
    Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):981-991. PubMed ID: 29244617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Textural features of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived model-free and model-based parameter maps in glioma grading.
    Xie T; Chen X; Fang J; Kang H; Xue W; Tong H; Cao P; Wang S; Yang Y; Zhang W
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1099-1111. PubMed ID: 28845594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software.
    Conte GM; Castellano A; Altabella L; Iadanza A; Cadioli M; Falini A; Anzalone N
    Radiol Med; 2017 Apr; 122(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 28070841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Which combination of MR imaging modalities is best for predicting recurrent glioblastoma? Study of diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility.
    Kim HS; Goh MJ; Kim N; Choi CG; Kim SJ; Kim JH
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):831-43. PubMed ID: 24885857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of three different MR perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy for multiparametric assessment in distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from stable disease.
    Seeger A; Braun C; Skardelly M; Paulsen F; Schittenhelm J; Ernemann U; Bisdas S
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1557-65. PubMed ID: 24200483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of Tumor Immunohistochemistry with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and DSC-MRI Parameters in Patients with Gliomas.
    Nguyen TB; Cron GO; Bezzina K; Perdrizet K; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Thornhill RE; Zanette B; Cameron IG
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Dec; 37(12):2217-2223. PubMed ID: 27585700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters for high-grade glioma patients.
    Ulyte A; Katsaros VK; Liouta E; Stranjalis G; Boskos C; Papanikolaou N; Usinskiene J; Bisdas S
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Dec; 58(12):1197-1208. PubMed ID: 27796446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glioma: Application of histogram analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to tumor grading.
    Jung SC; Yeom JA; Kim JH; Ryoo I; Kim SC; Shin H; Lee AL; Yun TJ; Park CK; Sohn CH; Park SH; Choi SH
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Jun; 35(6):1103-10. PubMed ID: 24384119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Volume-based histogram analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for estimation of gliomas IDH1 mutation status.
    Hu Y; Zhang N; Yu MH; Zhou XJ; Ge M; Shen DD; Hua Y; Shi JL; Jia ZZ
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109247. PubMed ID: 32891974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of DSC- and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Preoperative Grading of Astrocytomas.
    Nguyen TB; Cron GO; Perdrizet K; Bezzina K; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Sinclair J; Thornhill RE; Foottit C; Zanette B; Cameron IG
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Nov; 36(11):2017-22. PubMed ID: 26228886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiating between Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-grade Glioma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging with Histogram Analysis.
    Murayama K; Nishiyama Y; Hirose Y; Abe M; Ohyu S; Ninomiya A; Fukuba T; Katada K; Toyama H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jan; 17(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 28515410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.
    Jia L; Wu X; Wan Q; Wan L; Jia W; Zhang N
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20200699. PubMed ID: 33332981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Different Post-Processing Algorithms for Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Imaging of Cerebral Gliomas.
    Kudo K; Uwano I; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nakamura H; Fujima N; Yamashita F; Goodwin J; Higuchi S; Sasaki M
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 16(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27646457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative Assessment of Tumor Cell Proliferation in Brain Gliomas with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
    Jiang JS; Hua Y; Zhou XJ; Shen DD; Shi JL; Ge M; Geng QN; Jia ZZ
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Sep; 26(9):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 30416002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DSC and DCE Histogram Analyses of Glioma Biomarkers, Including IDH, MGMT, and TERT, on Differentiation and Survival.
    Zhang HW; Lyu GW; He WJ; Lei Y; Lin F; Wang MZ; Zhang H; Liang LH; Feng YN; Yang JH
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Dec; 27(12):e263-e271. PubMed ID: 31983532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perfusion MRI grading diffuse gliomas: Impact of permeability parameters on molecular biomarkers and survival.
    Hilario A; Hernandez-Lain A; Sepulveda JM; Lagares A; Perez-Nuñez A; Ramos A
    Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed); 2019; 30(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 30143443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.