These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29362476)

  • 1. Magneto-active substrates for local mechanical stimulation of living cells.
    Bidan CM; Fratzl M; Coullomb A; Moreau P; Lombard AH; Wang I; Balland M; Boudou T; Dempsey NM; Devillers T; Dupont A
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):1464. PubMed ID: 29362476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel patterned magnetic micropillar array substrate for analysis of cellular mechanical responses.
    Nagayama K; Inoue T; Hamada Y; Matsumoto T
    J Biomech; 2017 Dec; 65():194-202. PubMed ID: 29126605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magneto-responsive liquid crystalline elastomer nanocomposites as potential candidates for dynamic cell culture substrates.
    Herrera-Posada S; Mora-Navarro C; Ortiz-Bermudez P; Torres-Lugo M; McElhinny KM; Evans PG; Calcagno BO; Acevedo A
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Aug; 65():369-78. PubMed ID: 27157764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microfabricated substrates as a tool to study cell mechanotransduction.
    le Digabel J; Ghibaudo M; Trichet L; Richert A; Ladoux B
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2010 Oct; 48(10):965-76. PubMed ID: 20424924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic microposts as an approach to apply forces to living cells.
    Sniadecki NJ; Anguelouch A; Yang MT; Lamb CM; Liu Z; Kirschner SB; Liu Y; Reich DH; Chen CS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Sep; 104(37):14553-8. PubMed ID: 17804810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crosstalk between focal adhesions and material mechanical properties governs cell mechanics and functions.
    Fusco S; Panzetta V; Embrione V; Netti PA
    Acta Biomater; 2015 Sep; 23():63-71. PubMed ID: 26004223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying traction stresses in adherent cells.
    Kraning-Rush CM; Carey SP; Califano JP; Reinhart-King CA
    Methods Cell Biol; 2012; 110():139-78. PubMed ID: 22482948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Traction forces exerted by epithelial cell sheets.
    Saez A; Anon E; Ghibaudo M; du Roure O; Di Meglio JM; Hersen P; Silberzan P; Buguin A; Ladoux B
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2010 May; 22(19):194119. PubMed ID: 21386442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct application of mechanical stimulation to cell adhesion sites using a novel magnetic-driven micropillar substrate.
    Nagayama K; Inoue T; Hamada Y; Sugita S; Matsumoto T
    Biomed Microdevices; 2018 Sep; 20(4):85. PubMed ID: 30259169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence of a large-scale mechanosensing mechanism for cellular adaptation to substrate stiffness.
    Trichet L; Le Digabel J; Hawkins RJ; Vedula SR; Gupta M; Ribrault C; Hersen P; Voituriez R; Ladoux B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 May; 109(18):6933-8. PubMed ID: 22509005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The matrix environmental and cell mechanical properties regulate cell migration and contribute to the invasive phenotype of cancer cells.
    Mierke CT
    Rep Prog Phys; 2019 Jun; 82(6):064602. PubMed ID: 30947151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acto-myosin based response to stiffness and rigidity sensing.
    Fouchard J; Mitrossilis D; Asnacios A
    Cell Adh Migr; 2011; 5(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 20818154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic microposts for mechanical stimulation of biological cells: fabrication, characterization, and analysis.
    Sniadecki NJ; Lamb CM; Liu Y; Chen CS; Reich DH
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Apr; 79(4):044302. PubMed ID: 18447536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probing cellular traction forces by micropillar arrays: contribution of substrate warping to pillar deflection.
    Schoen I; Hu W; Klotzsch E; Vogel V
    Nano Lett; 2010 May; 10(5):1823-30. PubMed ID: 20387859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces?
    Saez A; Buguin A; Silberzan P; Ladoux B
    Biophys J; 2005 Dec; 89(6):L52-4. PubMed ID: 16214867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Traction forces exerted through N-cadherin contacts.
    Ganz A; Lambert M; Saez A; Silberzan P; Buguin A; Mège RM; Ladoux B
    Biol Cell; 2006 Dec; 98(12):721-30. PubMed ID: 16895521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Localized mechanical stimulation of single cells with engineered spatio-temporal profile.
    Monticelli M; Jokhun DS; Petti D; Shivashankar GV; Bertacco R
    Lab Chip; 2018 Sep; 18(19):2955-2965. PubMed ID: 30129955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single cell rigidity sensing: A complex relationship between focal adhesion dynamics and large-scale actin cytoskeleton remodeling.
    Gupta M; Doss B; Lim CT; Voituriez R; Ladoux B
    Cell Adh Migr; 2016 Sep; 10(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 27050660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probing cell structure by controlling the mechanical environment with cell-substrate interactions.
    Cheng CM; Steward RL; LeDuc PR
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 19064266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-dependent combinatory effects of active mechanical loading and passive topographical cues on cell orientation.
    Wang Q; Huang H; Wei K; Zhao Y
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2016 Oct; 113(10):2191-201. PubMed ID: 27003791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.