These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29362674)

  • 21. The Impact of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Neck-Abdominal First Approach on the Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Hoshino A; Nakajima Y; Kawada K; Tokairin Y; Okada T; Matsui T; Yamaguchi K; Kawano T; Kinugasa Y
    World J Surg; 2020 Nov; 44(11):3829-3836. PubMed ID: 32591842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Introduction of laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy as hybrid procedure and comparison with open esophagectomy. A propensity-matched retrospective study.
    Spiliotis AE; Gäbelein G; Malinowski M; Holländer S; Scherber PR; Glanemann M
    Minerva Surg; 2022 Feb; 77(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 35315265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery.
    Mori K; Yamagata Y; Aikou S; Nishida M; Kiyokawa T; Yagi K; Yamashita H; Nomura S; Seto Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2016 Jul; 29(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 25809390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial.
    Li B; Xiang J; Zhang Y; Li H; Zhang J; Sun Y; Hu H; Miao L; Ma L; Luo X; Chen S; Ye T; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Chen H
    JAMA Surg; 2015 Apr; 150(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 25650816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
    Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: Single Center Experience after 44 Consecutive Cases.
    Bjelović M; Babič T; Gunjić D; Veselinović M; Špica B
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(7-8):410-5. PubMed ID: 26506750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
    Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Postoperative Hiatal Hernia after Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy-A Growing Problem in the Age of Minimally Invasive Surgery.
    Kuvendjiska J; Jasinski R; Hipp J; Fink M; Fichtner-Feigl S; Diener MK; Hoeppner J
    J Clin Med; 2023 Sep; 12(17):. PubMed ID: 37685791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Early Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Thoracoscopic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Zhang Y; Han Y; Gan Q; Xiang J; Jin R; Chen K; Che J; Hang J; Li H
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1284-1291. PubMed ID: 30843161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy-Surgical Technique and Results.
    Kuvendjiska J; Marjanovic G; Glatz T; Kulemann B; Hoeppner J
    J Clin Med; 2019 Jul; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 31284370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.
    Luketich JD; Pennathur A; Awais O; Levy RM; Keeley S; Shende M; Christie NA; Weksler B; Landreneau RJ; Abbas G; Schuchert MJ; Nason KS
    Ann Surg; 2012 Jul; 256(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 22668811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?
    Dapri G; Himpens J; Cadière GB
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Apr; 22(4):1060-9. PubMed ID: 18071806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparison of the lymph node dissection and complications between video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) esophagectomy and conventional esophagectomy via right thoracotomic].
    Mao Y; He J; Zhang Z; Dong J; Gao S; Sun K; Cheng G; Mu J; Xue Q; Liu X; Fang D; Wang D; Zhao J; Li J; Wang Y; Gao Y; Huang J
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Jul; 37(7):530-3. PubMed ID: 26463331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Noble F; Kelly JJ; Bailey IS; Byrne JP; Underwood TJ;
    Dis Esophagus; 2013 Apr; 26(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 23551569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Comparison of the effect of lymph node dissection performed by Ivor-Lewis or left-sided thoracic esophagogastrectomy for Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction].
    Duan XF; Gong L; Ma MQ; Yue J; Tang P; Shang XB; Jiang HJ; Yu ZT
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 39(3):190-194. PubMed ID: 28316217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Thoracoscopy in prone position with two-lung ventilation compared to conventional thoracotomy during Ivor Lewis procedure: a multicenter case-control study.
    Souche R; Nayeri M; Chati R; Huet E; Donici I; Tuech JJ; Borie F; Prudhomme M; Jaber S; Fabre JM
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):142-152. PubMed ID: 30868323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.