These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

685 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29363857)

  • 1. Influence of human acute wound fluid on the antibacterial efficacy of different antiseptic polyurethane foam dressings: An in vitro analysis.
    Rembe JD; Fromm-Dornieden C; Böhm J; Stuermer EK
    Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Jan; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 29363857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of negative pressure wound therapy with antibacterial dressings or antiseptics on an in vitro wound model.
    Matiasek J; Domig KJ; Djedovic G; Babeluk R; Assadian O
    J Wound Care; 2017 May; 26(5):236-242. PubMed ID: 28475440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of flow cytometry to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against planktonic Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Percival SL; Slone W; Linton S; Okel T; Corum L; Thomas JG
    Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 21518089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardizing an in vitro procedure for the evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of wound dressings and the assessment of three wound dressings.
    Tkachenko O; Karas JA
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2012 Jul; 67(7):1697-700. PubMed ID: 22514261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antimicrobial efficacy of the silver wound dressing Biatain Ag in a disc carrier test simulating wound secretion.
    Ebert M; Assadian O; Hübner NO; Koburger T; Kramer A; ;
    Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2011; 24(6):337-41. PubMed ID: 21832866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro test of the efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in simulated wound fluid.
    Said J; Dodoo CC; Walker M; Parsons D; Stapleton P; Beezer AE; Gaisford S
    Int J Pharm; 2014 Feb; 462(1-2):123-8. PubMed ID: 24374221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ag5IO6: novel antibiofilm activity of a silver compound with application to medical devices.
    Incani V; Omar A; Prosperi-Porta G; Nadworny P
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2015 Jun; 45(6):586-93. PubMed ID: 25604278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antimicrobial Efficacy of a Silver Impregnated Hydrophilic PU Foam.
    Percival SL
    Surg Technol Int; 2018 Jun; 32():67-74. PubMed ID: 29529703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suprathel-acetic acid matrix versus acticoat and aquacel as an antiseptic dressing: an in vitro study.
    Ryssel H; Germann G; Riedel K; Reichenberger M; Hellmich S; Kloeters O
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Oct; 65(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 20798627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study on the ability of quaternary ammonium groups attached to a polyurethane foam wound dressing to inhibit bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.
    Tran PL; Hamood AN; de Souza A; Schultz G; Liesenfeld B; Mehta D; Reid TW
    Wound Repair Regen; 2015; 23(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 25469865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing two polymeric biguanides: chemical distinction, antiseptic efficacy and cytotoxicity of polyaminopropyl biguanide and polyhexamethylene biguanide.
    Rembe JD; Fromm-Dornieden C; Schäfer N; Böhm JK; Stuermer EK
    J Med Microbiol; 2016 Aug; 65(8):867-876. PubMed ID: 27302218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.
    Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antimicrobial properties of antiseptic-impregnated biological dressings.
    Kearney JN; Arain T; Holland KT
    J Hosp Infect; 1988 Jan; 11(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 2895140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a bi-layer wound dressing for burn care. II. In vitro and in vivo bactericidal properties.
    Martineau L; Shek PN
    Burns; 2006 Mar; 32(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 16455202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imparting commercial antimicrobial dressings with low-adherence to burn wounds.
    Asghari S; Logsetty S; Liu S
    Burns; 2016 Jun; 42(4):877-83. PubMed ID: 26847614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antimicrobial efficacy of a novel silver hydrogel dressing compared to two common silver burn wound dressings: Acticoat™ and PolyMem Silver(®).
    Boonkaew B; Kempf M; Kimble R; Supaphol P; Cuttle L
    Burns; 2014 Feb; 40(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 23790588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model.
    Lipp C; Kirker K; Agostinho A; James G; Stewart P
    J Wound Care; 2010 Jun; 19(6):220-6. PubMed ID: 20551862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uptake of PHMB in a bacterial nanocellulose-based wound dressing: A feasible clinical procedure.
    de Mattos IB; Holzer JCJ; Tuca AC; Groeber-Becker F; Funk M; Popp D; Mautner S; Birngruber T; Kamolz LP
    Burns; 2019 Jun; 45(4):898-904. PubMed ID: 30509765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of silver-containing antimicrobial dressings and drugs.
    Castellano JJ; Shafii SM; Ko F; Donate G; Wright TE; Mannari RJ; Payne WG; Smith DJ; Robson MC
    Int Wound J; 2007 Jun; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17651227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chitin membranes containing silver nanoparticles for wound dressing application.
    Singh R; Singh D
    Int Wound J; 2014 Jun; 11(3):264-8. PubMed ID: 22958740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.