215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29363857)
1. Influence of human acute wound fluid on the antibacterial efficacy of different antiseptic polyurethane foam dressings: An in vitro analysis.
Rembe JD; Fromm-Dornieden C; Böhm J; Stuermer EK
Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Jan; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 29363857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antimicrobial properties of antiseptic-impregnated biological dressings.
Kearney JN; Arain T; Holland KT
J Hosp Infect; 1988 Jan; 11(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 2895140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a bi-layer wound dressing for burn care. II. In vitro and in vivo bactericidal properties.
Martineau L; Shek PN
Burns; 2006 Mar; 32(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 16455202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of silver-containing antimicrobial dressings and drugs.
Castellano JJ; Shafii SM; Ko F; Donate G; Wright TE; Mannari RJ; Payne WG; Smith DJ; Robson MC
Int Wound J; 2007 Jun; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17651227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro prevention and inactivation of biofilms using controlled-release iodine foam dressings for wound healing.
Watson F; Chen R; Percival SL
Int Wound J; 2024 Jan; 21(1):e14365. PubMed ID: 37715349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antimicrobial Nonisocyanate Polyurethane Foam Derived from Lignin for Wound Healing.
Li J; Xu X; Ma X; Cui M; Wang X; Chen J; Zhu J; Chen J
ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2024 Feb; 7(2):1301-1310. PubMed ID: 38305746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In Vitro Efficacy of Bacterial Cellulose Dressings Chemisorbed with Antiseptics against Biofilm Formed by Pathogens Isolated from Chronic Wounds.
Dydak K; Junka A; Dydak A; Brożyna M; Paleczny J; Fijalkowski K; Kubielas G; Aniołek O; Bartoszewicz M
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 33924416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simple in vitro model to test the efficacy of antimicrobial agents released from dressings.
Grzybowski J; Antos M; Trafny EA
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 1996 Oct; 36(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 8912224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing antibacterial efficacy of a polyhexanide hydrogel versus alginate-based wound dressing in burns.
De Decker I; Janssens D; De Mey K; Hoeksema H; Simaey M; De Coninck P; Verbelen J; De Pessemier A; Blondeel P; Monstrey S; Claes KE
J Wound Care; 2024 May; 33(5):335-347. PubMed ID: 38683776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modified in-vitro AATCC-100 procedure to measure viable bacteria from wound dressings.
Lee SH; Glover T; Lavey N; Fu X; Donohue M; Karunasena E
PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0298829. PubMed ID: 38512908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nanocrystalline silver dressings as an efficient anti-MRSA barrier: a new solution to an increasing problem.
Strohal R; Schelling M; Takacs M; Jurecka W; Gruber U; Offner F
J Hosp Infect; 2005 Jul; 60(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 15896880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro assessment of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated polyurethane foam antimicrobial dressing using zone of inhibition assays.
Bhende S; Spangler D
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 25(8):664-7. PubMed ID: 15357158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antimicrobial activity of silver-containing dressings on wound microorganisms using an in vitro biofilm model.
Percival SL; Bowler PG; Dolman J
Int Wound J; 2007 Jun; 4(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 17651233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro study of antimicrobial activity and efficacy of iodine-generating hydrogel dressings.
Thorn RM; Greenman J; Austin A
J Wound Care; 2006 Jul; 15(7):305-10. PubMed ID: 16869198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of chitosan bandage to prevent fatal infections developing from highly contaminated wounds in mice.
Burkatovskaya M; Tegos GP; Swietlik E; Demidova TN; P Castano A; Hamblin MR
Biomaterials; 2006 Aug; 27(22):4157-64. PubMed ID: 16616364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local environment of chronic wounds under synthetic dressings.
Varghese MC; Balin AK; Carter DM; Caldwell D
Arch Dermatol; 1986 Jan; 122(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 3079991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antimicrobial properties of silver-containing wound dressings: a microcalorimetric study.
O'Neill MA; Vine GJ; Beezer AE; Bishop AH; Hadgraft J; Labetoulle C; Walker M; Bowler PG
Int J Pharm; 2003 Sep; 263(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 12954181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Film dressings from Thai mango seed kernel extracts versus nanocrystalline silver dressings in antibacterial properties.
Hasatsri S; Jantrapanukorn B
J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2024; 27():12674. PubMed ID: 38606395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro diffusion bed, 3-day repeat challenge 'capacity' test for antimicrobial wound dressings.
Greenman J; Thorn RM; Saad S; Austin AJ
Int Wound J; 2006 Dec; 3(4):322-9. PubMed ID: 17199767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The disinfection of silicone-foam dressings.
Evans BK; Harding KG; Marks J; Ribeiro CD
J Clin Hosp Pharm; 1985 Sep; 10(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 3934212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
