These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT. Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-cost GICs reduce survival rate in occlusal ART restorations in primary molars after one year: A RCT. Olegário IC; Pacheco AL; de Araújo MP; Ladewig NM; Bonifácio CC; Imparato JC; Raggio DP J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():45-50. PubMed ID: 27956016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial. Garbim JR; Saihara CS; Olegário IC; Hesse D; Araujo MP; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Raggio DP BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 38824540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT. Oliveira RC; Camargo LB; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Olegário IC; Gimenez T; Pássaro AL; Tedesco TK; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):371. PubMed ID: 34301217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. Duque C; Aida KL; Pereira JA; Teixeira GS; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Perrone LR; Caiaffa KS; Negrini TC; Castilho ARF; Costa CAS J Appl Oral Sci; 2017; 25(5):541-550. PubMed ID: 29069152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atraumatic restorative treatment with resin-modified glass ionomer material: short-term results of a pilot study. Dülgergil CT; Soyman M; Civelek A Med Princ Pract; 2005; 14(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 15961941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Olegário IC; Hesse D; Mendes FM; Bonifácio CC; Raggio DP Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 30171345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial. Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Guglielmi Cde A; Franca Cd; Mendes FM; Raggio DP Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26039906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of ART and conventional techniques on clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement restorations in load bearing areas of permanent and primary dentitions: A systematic review. Ruengrungsom C; Palamara JEA; Burrow MF J Dent; 2018 Nov; 78():1-21. PubMed ID: 30017937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement. Mallow PK; Durward CS; Klaipo M Int J Paediatr Dent; 1998 Mar; 8(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9558544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations. Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Raggio DP; Bönecker M; van Loveren C; van Amerongen WE Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jul; 23(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 22891625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed. Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE; Mwalili SM Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21703078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM; Yip HK; Smales RJ Int Dent J; 2004 Feb; 54(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15005472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-viscosity glass-ionomer vs. composite resin restorations in persons with disability: Five-year follow-up of clinical trial. Molina GF; Faulks D; Mulder J; Frencken JE Braz Oral Res; 2019; 33():e099. PubMed ID: 31778471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up. Deepa G; Shobha T Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 20642467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations. Banomyong D; Messer H J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-year survival of glass ionomer sealants placed as part of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations. Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE East Afr Med J; 2010 Sep; 87(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 23457815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]