These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29365164)

  • 1. Reaction norm for yearling weight in beef cattle using single-step genomic evaluation.
    Oliveira DP; Lourenco DAL; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Santos DJA; de Araújo Neto FR; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Baldi F; Carvalheiro R; de Camargo GMF; Albuquerque LG; Tonhati H
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Feb; 96(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29365164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic reaction norm models exploiting genotype × environment interaction on sexual precocity indicator traits in Nellore cattle.
    Mota LFM; Fernandes GA; Herrera AC; Scalez DCB; Espigolan R; Magalhães AFB; Carvalheiro R; Baldi F; Albuquerque LG
    Anim Genet; 2020 Mar; 51(2):210-223. PubMed ID: 31944356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genotype × environment interaction for age at first calving, scrotal circumference, and yearling weight in Nellore cattle using reaction norms in multitrait random regression models.
    Chiaia HL; de Lemos MV; Venturini GC; Aboujaoude C; Berton MP; Feitosa FB; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Baldi F
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Apr; 93(4):1503-10. PubMed ID: 26020172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
    Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of genomic information to exploit genotype-by-environment interactions for body weight of broiler chicken in bio-secure and production environments.
    Chu TT; Bastiaansen JWM; Berg P; Romé H; Marois D; Henshall J; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):50. PubMed ID: 31533614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor to enhance the mitigation of seasonal losses due to heat stress in pigs.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Bradford HL; Gray KA; Huang Y; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5004-5013. PubMed ID: 28046178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sire evaluation for total number born in pigs using a genomic reaction norms approach.
    Silva FF; Mulder HA; Knol EF; Lopes MS; Guimarães SE; Lopes PS; Mathur PK; Viana JM; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Sep; 92(9):3825-34. PubMed ID: 24492557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genotype-by-environment interaction of fertility traits in Danish Holstein cattle using a single-step genomic reaction norm model.
    Zhang Z; Kargo M; Liu A; Thomasen JR; Pan Y; Su G
    Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Aug; 123(2):202-214. PubMed ID: 30760882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotype by environment interaction for tick resistance of Hereford and Braford beef cattle using reaction norm models.
    Mota RR; Tempelman RJ; Lopes PS; Aguilar I; Silva FF; Cardoso FF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():3. PubMed ID: 26767704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic Prediction Using Alternative Strategies of Weighted Single-Step Genomic BLUP for Yearling Weight and Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Beef Cattle.
    Mehrban H; Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Cho C; Choi T; Park M; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33673102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Weighted Single-Step Genome-Wide Association Study for Growth Traits in Chinese Simmental Beef Cattle.
    Zhuang Z; Xu L; Yang J; Gao H; Zhang L; Gao X; Li J; Zhu B
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 32053968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genotype × prenatal and post-weaning nutritional environment interaction in a composite beef cattle breed using reaction norms and a multi-trait model.
    Hay EH; Roberts A
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Mar; 96(2):444-453. PubMed ID: 29385480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of genomic predictions for harvest and carcass weight in channel catfish.
    Garcia ALS; Bosworth B; Waldbieser G; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):66. PubMed ID: 30547740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reaction norms for the study of genotype-environment interaction for growth and indicator traits of sexual precocity in Nellore cattle.
    Lemos MV; Chiaia HL; Berton MP; Feitosa FL; Aboujaoude C; Venturini GC; Oliveira HN; Albuquerque LG; Baldi F
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Jun; 14(2):7151-62. PubMed ID: 26125926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inclusion of sire by herd interaction effect in the genomic evaluation for weaning weight of American Angus.
    Jang S; Lourenco D; Miller S
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Mar; 100(3):. PubMed ID: 35213718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Macro- and micro-genetic environmental sensitivity of yearling weight in Angus beef cattle.
    Madsen MD; van der Werf JHJ; Clark S
    Animal; 2024 Feb; 18(2):101068. PubMed ID: 38237477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction accuracies and genetic parameters for test-day traits from genomic and pedigree-based random regression models with or without heat stress interactions.
    Bohlouli M; Alijani S; Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):488-502. PubMed ID: 30343923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genotype by environment (climate) interaction improves genomic prediction for production traits in US Holstein cattle.
    Tiezzi F; de Los Campos G; Parker Gaddis KL; Maltecca C
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Mar; 100(3):2042-2056. PubMed ID: 28109596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.