These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29365164)
21. Genomic prediction using different estimation methodology, blending and cross-validation techniques for growth traits and visual scores in Hereford and Braford cattle. Campos GS; Reimann FA; Cardoso LL; Ferreira CER; Junqueira VS; Schmidt PI; Braccini Neto J; Yokoo MJI; Sollero BP; Boligon AA; Cardoso FF J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(7):2579-2595. PubMed ID: 29741705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Genetic control of residual variance of yearling weight in Nellore beef cattle. Iung LHS; Neves HHR; Mulder HA; Carvalheiro R J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1425-1433. PubMed ID: 28464101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Genome-wide association study considering genotype-by-environment interaction for productive and reproductive traits using whole-genome sequencing in Nellore cattle. Carvalho Filho I; Arikawa LM; Mota LFM; Campos GS; Fonseca LFS; Fernandes Júnior GA; Schenkel FS; Lourenco D; Silva DA; Teixeira CS; Silva TL; Albuquerque LG; Carvalheiro R BMC Genomics; 2024 Jun; 25(1):623. PubMed ID: 38902640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Genome-enabled prediction for tick resistance in Hereford and Braford beef cattle via reaction norm models. Mota RR; Lopes PS; Tempelman RJ; Silva FF; Aguilar I; Gomes CC; Cardoso FF J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1834-43. PubMed ID: 27285681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus. Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Bertrand JK; Amen TS; Wang L; Moser DW; Misztal I J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2653-62. PubMed ID: 26115253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Single-step genomic evaluation for growth traits in a Mexican Braunvieh cattle population. Valerio-Hernández JE; Ruíz-Flores A; Nilforooshan MA; Pérez-Rodríguez P Anim Biosci; 2023 Jul; 36(7):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 36915917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genomic and single-step evaluations of carcass traits of young bulls in dual-purpose cattle. Croué I; Ducrocq V J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Aug; 134(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 28266083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Weak genotype x environment interaction suggests that measuring scrotal circumference at 12 and 18 mo of age is helpful to select precocious Brahman cattle. Nascimento BM; Carvalheiro R; Teixeira RA; Dias LT; Fortes MRS J Anim Sci; 2022 Sep; 100(9):. PubMed ID: 35881500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Genotype × environment interaction for long-yearling weight in Canchim cattle quantified by reaction norm analysis. Mattar M; Silva LO; Alencar MM; Cardoso FF J Anim Sci; 2011 Aug; 89(8):2349-55. PubMed ID: 21421832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models. Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Symposium review: Single-step genomic evaluations in dairy cattle. Mäntysaari EA; Koivula M; Strandén I J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5314-5326. PubMed ID: 32331883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data. Tonussi RL; Silva RMO; Magalhães AFB; Espigolan R; Peripolli E; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Chiaia HLJ; Pereira ASC; Lôbo RB; Bezerra LAF; Magnabosco CU; Lourenço DAL; Aguilar I; Baldi F PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0181752. PubMed ID: 28957330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genotype-by-gestational thermal environment interaction and its impact on the future performance of tropical composite beef cattle offspring. Cardoso MGR; Bignardi AB; Pereira RJ; Eler JP; Ferraz JBS; Brito LF; Santana ML J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 39028536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations. Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Single step genomic evaluation for female fertility in Nordic Red dairy cattle. Matilainen K; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Oct; 135(5):337-348. PubMed ID: 30112802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins. Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models. Garcia-Baccino CA; Lourenco DAL; Miller S; Cantet RJC; Vitezica ZG J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31867623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Genetic evaluations for growth heat tolerance in Angus cattle. Bradford HL; Fragomeni BO; Bertrand JK; Lourenco DA; Misztal I J Anim Sci; 2016 Oct; 94(10):4143-4150. PubMed ID: 27898850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating genotype by environment interaction for growth traits in Limousine cattle. Callegaro S; Tiezzi F; Fabbri MC; Biffani S; Bozzi R Animal; 2024 Nov; 18(11):101344. PubMed ID: 39426371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Genotype by production environment interaction for birth and weaning weights in a population of composite beef cattle. Santana ML; Eler JP; Bignardi AB; Ferraz JB Animal; 2014 Mar; 8(3):379-87. PubMed ID: 24534687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]