These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29365341)

  • 1. Improving the Accuracy of a Clinical Decision Support System for Cervical Cancer Screening and Surveillance.
    Ravikumar KE; MacLaughlin KL; Scheitel MR; Kessler M; Wagholikar KB; Liu H; Chaudhry R
    Appl Clin Inform; 2018 Jan; 9(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 29365341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Patient Reminders on Papanicolaou Test Completion for High-Risk Patients Identified by a Clinical Decision Support System.
    MacLaughlin KL; Kessler ME; Komandur Elayavilli R; Hickey BC; Scheitel MR; Wagholikar KB; Liu H; Kremers WK; Chaudhry R
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 May; 27(5):569-574. PubMed ID: 29297754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Formative evaluation of the accuracy of a clinical decision support system for cervical cancer screening.
    Wagholikar KB; MacLaughlin KL; Kastner TM; Casey PM; Henry M; Greenes RA; Liu H; Chaudhry R
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013; 20(4):749-57. PubMed ID: 23564631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening.
    Wagholikar KB; MacLaughlin KL; Henry MR; Greenes RA; Hankey RA; Liu H; Chaudhry R
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012; 19(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 22542812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decision support systems in clinical practice: The case of venous thromboembolism prevention.
    Nazarenko GI; Kleymenova EB; Payushik SA; Otdelenov VA; Sychev DA; Yashina LP
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S104-5. PubMed ID: 26639683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.
    Main C; Moxham T; Wyatt JC; Kay J; Anderson R; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(48):1-227. PubMed ID: 21034668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inadequate Systems to Support Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice.
    Schapira MM; Sprague BL; Klabunde CN; Tosteson AN; Bitton A; Chen JS; Beaber EF; Onega T; MacLean CD; Harris K; Howe K; Pearson L; Feldman S; Brawarsky P; Haas JS;
    J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1148-55. PubMed ID: 27251058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making Sense of Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines and Recommendations.
    Davis M; Feldman S
    Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2015 Dec; 16(12):55. PubMed ID: 26467929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review.
    Oluoch T; Santas X; Kwaro D; Were M; Biondich P; Bailey C; Abu-Hanna A; de Keizer N
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Oct; 81(10):e83-92. PubMed ID: 22921485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ASCCP Colposcopy Standards: Colposcopy Quality Improvement Recommendations for the United States.
    Mayeaux EJ; Novetsky AP; Chelmow D; Garcia F; Choma K; Liu AH; Papasozomenos T; Einstein MH; Massad LS; Wentzensen N; Waxman AG; Conageski C; Khan MJ; Huh WK
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Oct; 21(4):242-248. PubMed ID: 28953113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From an expert-driven paper guideline to a user-centred decision support system: a usability comparison study.
    Kilsdonk E; Peute LW; Riezebos RJ; Kremer LC; Jaspers MW
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 Sep; 59(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 23684240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of electronic medical record-based tools to improve compliance with cervical cancer screening guidelines: effect of an educational intervention on physicians' practice patterns.
    White P; Kenton K
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Apr; 17(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 23343700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Influence of Clinical Decision Support on Diagnostic Accuracy in Nurse Practitioners.
    Vetter MJ
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2015 Dec; 12(6):355-63. PubMed ID: 26630088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Information Engineering and Workflow Design in a Clinical Decision Support System for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Iran.
    Maserat E; Seied Farajollah SS; Safdari R; Ghazisaeedi M; Aghdaei HA; Zali MR
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(15):6605-8. PubMed ID: 26434882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of randomized controlled trials of medical record powered clinical decision support system to improve quality of diabetes care.
    Ali SM; Giordano R; Lakhani S; Walker DM
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():91-100. PubMed ID: 26806716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration of Hospital Information and Clinical Decision Support Systems to Enable the Reuse of Electronic Health Record Data.
    Kopanitsa G
    Methods Inf Med; 2017 May; 56(3):238-247. PubMed ID: 28361157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved preventive care clinical decision-making efficiency: leveraging a point-of-care clinical decision support system.
    Laing S; Mercer J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Nov; 21(1):315. PubMed ID: 34763691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design Process and Utilization of a Novel Clinical Decision Support System for Neuropathic Pain in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Observational Study.
    Guenter D; Abouzahra M; Schabort I; Radhakrishnan A; Nair K; Orr S; Langevin J; Taenzer P; Moulin DE
    JMIR Med Inform; 2019 Sep; 7(3):e14141. PubMed ID: 31573946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical decision support software for management of chronic heart failure: development and evaluation.
    Leslie SJ; Hartswood M; Meurig C; McKee SP; Slack R; Procter R; Denvir MA
    Comput Biol Med; 2006 May; 36(5):495-506. PubMed ID: 15927176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Usability Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support System for Geriatric ED Pain Treatment.
    Genes N; Kim MS; Thum FL; Rivera L; Beato R; Song C; Soriano J; Kannry J; Baumlin K; Hwang U
    Appl Clin Inform; 2016; 7(1):128-42. PubMed ID: 27081412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.