These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29366771)
1. Conflict monitoring in multi-sensory flanker tasks: Effects of cross-modal distractors on the N2 component. Fong MC; Hui NY; Fung ESW; Chu PCK; Wang WS Neurosci Lett; 2018 Mar; 670():31-35. PubMed ID: 29366771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2. Kałamała P; Szewczyk J; Senderecka M; Wodniecka Z Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28845513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential modulation of the N2 and P3 event-related potentials by response conflict and inhibition. Groom MJ; Cragg L Brain Cogn; 2015 Jul; 97():1-9. PubMed ID: 25955278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural cascade of conflict processing: Not just time-on-task. McKay CC; van den Berg B; Woldorff MG Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():184-191. PubMed ID: 28017818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner. Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conflict control processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: an event related potentials study. Mahé G; Doignon-Camus N; Dufour A; Bonnefond A Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Jan; 125(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 23810636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks. Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. White matter microstructure within the superior longitudinal fasciculus modulates the degree of response conflict indexed by N2 in healthy adults. Gao S; Liu P; Guo J; Zhu Y; Liu P; Sun J; Yang X; Qin W Brain Res; 2017 Dec; 1676():1-8. PubMed ID: 28916440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes. Nigbur R; Schneider J; Sommer W; Dimigen O; Stürmer B Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():76-84. PubMed ID: 25482266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory. Clayson PE; Larson MJ Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1953-61. PubMed ID: 21435347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neurophysiological indices of the transfer of cognitive training gains to untrained tasks. Wang X; Covey TJ Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 May; 171():107205. PubMed ID: 32145406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological dynamics reveal distinct processing of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflicts. Li Q; Wang K; Nan W; Zheng Y; Wu H; Wang H; Liu X Psychophysiology; 2015 Apr; 52(4):562-71. PubMed ID: 25395309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task. Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrophysiological correlates of proportion congruency manipulation in a temporal flanker task. Jost K; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T Psychophysiology; 2022 Nov; 59(11):e14092. PubMed ID: 35569101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric properties of conflict monitoring and conflict adaptation indices: response time and conflict N2 event-related potentials. Clayson PE; Larson MJ Psychophysiology; 2013 Dec; 50(12):1209-19. PubMed ID: 23992600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sex differences in electrophysiological indices of conflict monitoring. Clayson PE; Clawson A; Larson MJ Biol Psychol; 2011 May; 87(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 21470571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural mechanism of conflict control in a number interference task. Xiao X; Yang W; Jia L; Lei M; Chen A; Zhang Q Neuroreport; 2011 Dec; 22(18):979-83. PubMed ID: 22045253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are low and high number magnitudes processed differently while resolving the conflict evoked by the SNARC effect? Gut M; Szumska I; Wasilewska M; Jaśkowski P Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 22343113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cognitive and affective control in a flanker word task: common and dissociable brain mechanisms. Alguacil S; Tudela P; Ruz M Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(9):1663-72. PubMed ID: 23747603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of the time course for processing conflict: an event-related potentials study with 4 year olds and adults. Rueda MR; Posner MI; Rothbart MK; Davis-Stober CP BMC Neurosci; 2004 Oct; 5():39. PubMed ID: 15500693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]