160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29366771)
1. Conflict monitoring in multi-sensory flanker tasks: Effects of cross-modal distractors on the N2 component.
Fong MC; Hui NY; Fung ESW; Chu PCK; Wang WS
Neurosci Lett; 2018 Mar; 670():31-35. PubMed ID: 29366771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2.
Kałamała P; Szewczyk J; Senderecka M; Wodniecka Z
Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28845513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential modulation of the N2 and P3 event-related potentials by response conflict and inhibition.
Groom MJ; Cragg L
Brain Cogn; 2015 Jul; 97():1-9. PubMed ID: 25955278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural cascade of conflict processing: Not just time-on-task.
McKay CC; van den Berg B; Woldorff MG
Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():184-191. PubMed ID: 28017818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conflict control processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: an event related potentials study.
Mahé G; Doignon-Camus N; Dufour A; Bonnefond A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Jan; 125(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 23810636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. White matter microstructure within the superior longitudinal fasciculus modulates the degree of response conflict indexed by N2 in healthy adults.
Gao S; Liu P; Guo J; Zhu Y; Liu P; Sun J; Yang X; Qin W
Brain Res; 2017 Dec; 1676():1-8. PubMed ID: 28916440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.
Nigbur R; Schneider J; Sommer W; Dimigen O; Stürmer B
Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():76-84. PubMed ID: 25482266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory.
Clayson PE; Larson MJ
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1953-61. PubMed ID: 21435347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neurophysiological indices of the transfer of cognitive training gains to untrained tasks.
Wang X; Covey TJ
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 May; 171():107205. PubMed ID: 32145406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological dynamics reveal distinct processing of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflicts.
Li Q; Wang K; Nan W; Zheng Y; Wu H; Wang H; Liu X
Psychophysiology; 2015 Apr; 52(4):562-71. PubMed ID: 25395309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrophysiological correlates of proportion congruency manipulation in a temporal flanker task.
Jost K; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
Psychophysiology; 2022 Nov; 59(11):e14092. PubMed ID: 35569101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric properties of conflict monitoring and conflict adaptation indices: response time and conflict N2 event-related potentials.
Clayson PE; Larson MJ
Psychophysiology; 2013 Dec; 50(12):1209-19. PubMed ID: 23992600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sex differences in electrophysiological indices of conflict monitoring.
Clayson PE; Clawson A; Larson MJ
Biol Psychol; 2011 May; 87(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 21470571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural mechanism of conflict control in a number interference task.
Xiao X; Yang W; Jia L; Lei M; Chen A; Zhang Q
Neuroreport; 2011 Dec; 22(18):979-83. PubMed ID: 22045253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are low and high number magnitudes processed differently while resolving the conflict evoked by the SNARC effect?
Gut M; Szumska I; Wasilewska M; Jaśkowski P
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 22343113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cognitive and affective control in a flanker word task: common and dissociable brain mechanisms.
Alguacil S; Tudela P; Ruz M
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(9):1663-72. PubMed ID: 23747603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of the time course for processing conflict: an event-related potentials study with 4 year olds and adults.
Rueda MR; Posner MI; Rothbart MK; Davis-Stober CP
BMC Neurosci; 2004 Oct; 5():39. PubMed ID: 15500693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
