185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29367093)
1. A mini-fluid challenge of 150mL predicts fluid responsiveness using Modelflow
Smorenberg A; Cherpanath TGV; Geerts BF; de Wilde RBP; Jansen JRC; Maas JJ; Groeneveld ABJ
J Clin Anesth; 2018 May; 46():17-22. PubMed ID: 29367093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation.
Yonis H; Bitker L; Aublanc M; Perinel Ragey S; Riad Z; Lissonde F; Louf-Durier A; Debord S; Gobert F; Tapponnier R; Guérin C; Richard JC
Crit Care; 2017 Dec; 21(1):295. PubMed ID: 29208025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F
Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ability of a New Smartphone Pulse Pressure Variation and Cardiac Output Application to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
Joosten A; Boudart C; Vincent JL; Vanden Eynden F; Barvais L; Van Obbergh L; Rinehart J; Desebbe O
Anesth Analg; 2019 Jun; 128(6):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 31094781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.
Geerts BF; Maas J; de Wilde RB; Aarts LP; Jansen JR
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):802-6. PubMed ID: 21799416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ventilator-induced central venous pressure variation can predict fluid responsiveness in post-operative cardiac surgery patients.
Cherpanath TG; Geerts BF; Maas JJ; de Wilde RB; Groeneveld AB; Jansen JR
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2016 Nov; 60(10):1395-1403. PubMed ID: 27624218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The value of passive leg raising test in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction].
Xiang S; Muyun H; Juan C; Bin O; Minying C; Changjie C; Jianfeng W; Zimeng L; Yongjun L; Shunwei H; Lifen L; Xiangdong G
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Sep; 27(9):729-34. PubMed ID: 26955698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of changes in cardiac index with calibrated pulse contour analysis in cardiac surgery: A prospective observational study.
Fischer MO; Rebet O; Guinot PG; Lemétayer C; Saplacan V; Gérard JL; Fellahi JL; Hanouz JL; Lorne E;
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2016 Aug; 35(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 27083307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study.
Muller L; Toumi M; Bousquet PJ; Riu-Poulenc B; Louart G; Candela D; Zoric L; Suehs C; de La Coussaye JE; Molinari N; Lefrant JY;
Anesthesiology; 2011 Sep; 115(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 21792056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic variables and fluid responsiveness in patients for aortic stenosis surgery.
Høiseth LØ; Hoff IE; Hagen OA; Landsverk SA; Kirkebøen KA
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2014 Aug; 58(7):826-34. PubMed ID: 24773498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Sensitivity and Specificity of Pulmonary Carbon Dioxide Elimination for Noninvasive Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness.
Tusman G; Groisman I; Maidana GA; Scandurra A; Arca JM; Bohm SH; Suarez-Sipmann F
Anesth Analg; 2016 May; 122(5):1404-11. PubMed ID: 26505574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: tidal vs. forced inspiratory breathing.
Hong DM; Lee JM; Seo JH; Min JJ; Jeon Y; Bahk JH
Anaesthesia; 2014 Jul; 69(7):717-22. PubMed ID: 24773446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients.
Wiesenack C; Fiegl C; Keyser A; Prasser C; Keyl C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2005 Sep; 22(9):658-65. PubMed ID: 16163911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pulse-pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness during heart displacement for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Lee JH; Jeon Y; Bahk JH; Gil NS; Kim KB; Hong DM; Kim HJ
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1056-62. PubMed ID: 21924634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The value of end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure combined passive leg raising test on volume responsiveness assessment in shocked patients post cardiac operation].
Yao T; Wu W; Zheng X; Fang Q
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2016 Mar; 28(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 29919998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide and volumetric carbon dioxide as predictors of volume responsiveness in hemodynamically unstable patients.
Young A; Marik PE; Sibole S; Grooms D; Levitov A
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Aug; 27(4):681-4. PubMed ID: 23182383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method.
Biais M; Cottenceau V; Stecken L; Jean M; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Sztark F
Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1186-91. PubMed ID: 22425817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Respiratory changes in subclavian vein diameters predicts fluid responsiveness in intensive care patients: a pilot study.
Giraud R; Abraham PS; Brindel P; Siegenthaler N; Bendjelid K
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1049-1055. PubMed ID: 29380189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients.
Reuter DA; Bayerlein J; Goepfert MS; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
Intensive Care Med; 2003 Mar; 29(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 12579420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
