BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29367093)

  • 21. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation.
    Myatra SN; Prabu NR; Divatia JV; Monnet X; Kulkarni AP; Teboul JL
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 27922879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index.
    Fischer MO; Pelissier A; Bohadana D; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL; Fellahi JL
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 23992654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changes in end-tidal CO2 could predict fluid responsiveness in the passive leg raising test but not in the mini-fluid challenge test: A prospective and observational study.
    Xiao-ting W; Hua Z; Da-wei L; Hong-min Z; Huai-wu H; Yun L; Wen-zhao C
    J Crit Care; 2015 Oct; 30(5):1061-6. PubMed ID: 26140954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
    Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.
    Osman D; Ridel C; Ray P; Monnet X; Anguel N; Richard C; Teboul JL
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17080001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness†.
    Mallat J; Meddour M; Durville E; Lemyze M; Pepy F; Temime J; Vangrunderbeeck N; Tronchon L; Thevenin D; Tavernier B
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Sep; 115(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 26152341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.
    Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mini-fluid Challenge of 100 ml of Crystalloid Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in the Operating Room.
    Biais M; de Courson H; Lanchon R; Pereira B; Bardonneau G; Griton M; Sesay M; Nouette-Gaulain K
    Anesthesiology; 2017 Sep; 127(3):450-456. PubMed ID: 28640019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Identification of volume parameters monitored with a noninvasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness in children after congenital heart disease surgery.
    Cheng YW; Xu F; Li J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(39):e12289. PubMed ID: 30278500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.
    Perner A; Faber T
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1068-73. PubMed ID: 16939480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automated, continuous and non-invasive assessment of pulse pressure variations using CNAP
    Biais M; Stecken L; Martin A; Roullet S; Quinart A; Sztark F
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):685-692. PubMed ID: 27312841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of fluid responsiveness with end-tidal carbon dioxide using a simplified passive leg raising maneuver: a prospective observational study.
    Toupin F; Clairoux A; Deschamps A; Lebon JS; Lamarche Y; Lambert J; Fortier A; Denault AY
    Can J Anaesth; 2016 Sep; 63(9):1033-41. PubMed ID: 27307176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Colloids in Cardiac Surgery-Friend or Foe?
    Ryhammer PK; Tang M; Hoffmann-Petersen J; Leonaviciute D; Greisen J; Storebjerg Gissel M; Jakobsen CJ
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1639-1648. PubMed ID: 28372955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
    Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
    Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Kramer A; Zygun D; Hawes H; Easton P; Ferland A
    Chest; 2004 Nov; 126(5):1563-8. PubMed ID: 15539728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cardiac cycle efficiency and dicrotic pressure variations: new parameters for fluid therapy: An observational study.
    Messina A; Romano SM; Bonicolini E; Colombo D; Cammarota G; Chiostri M; Della Corte F; Navalesi P; Payen D; Romagnoli S
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Nov; 34(11):755-763. PubMed ID: 28722695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. End-expiratory occlusion manoeuvre does not accurately predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre.
    Guinot PG; Godart J; de Broca B; Bernard E; Lorne E; Dupont H
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Jun; 112(6):1050-4. PubMed ID: 24598390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Low predictability of three different noninvasive methods to determine fluid responsiveness in critically ill children.
    Weber T; Wagner T; Neumann K; Deusch E
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2015 Mar; 16(3):e89-94. PubMed ID: 25647238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Utility of changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide after volume expansion to assess fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a prospective observational study.
    de Courson H; Chauvet J; Le Gall L; Georges D; Boyer P; Verchère E; Nouette-Gaulain K; Biais M
    Br J Anaesth; 2020 Nov; 125(5):672-679. PubMed ID: 32863016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.
    Auler JO; Galas F; Hajjar L; Santos L; Carvalho T; Michard F
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Apr; 106(4):1201-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18349193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.