These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29367171)

  • 1. The UK National DNA Database: Implementation of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.
    Amankwaa AO; McCartney C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Mar; 284():117-128. PubMed ID: 29367171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Familial searching: a specialist forensic DNA profiling service utilising the National DNA Database to identify unknown offenders via their relatives--the UK experience.
    Maguire CN; McCallum LA; Storey C; Whitaker JP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 24315582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forensic DNA retention: Public perspective studies in the United Kingdom and around the world.
    Amankwaa AO
    Sci Justice; 2018 Nov; 58(6):455-464. PubMed ID: 30446075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minors or suspects? A discussion of the legal and ethical issues surrounding the indefinite storage of DNA collected from children aged 10-18 years on the National DNA Database in England and Wales.
    Mansel C; Davies S
    Med Sci Law; 2012 Oct; 52(4):187-92. PubMed ID: 22941519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Legal regime of preservation of data on identifiers obtained form DNA analysis, in the light of the Decision of the European Tribunal of Human Rights (Large Chamber), of December 4 2008 (S. and Marper vs. United Kingdom)].
    Reverón Palenzuela B
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2009; (30):171-90. PubMed ID: 19860346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 'Wonderment and dread': representations of DNA in ethical disputes about forensic DNA databases.
    Williams R; Johnson P
    New Genet Soc; 2004 Aug; 23(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 15460615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forensic databases: implications of the cases of S and Marper.
    Hepple B
    Med Sci Law; 2009 Apr; 49(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19537444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A database of the innocent?
    Bingham R
    Splice Life; 2001; 7(2-3):8-9. PubMed ID: 12564461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gaughran vs the UK and public acceptability of forensic biometrics retention.
    Amankwaa A; McCartney C
    Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):204-205. PubMed ID: 32381236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beware! Uncle Sam has your DNA: legal fallout from its use and misuse in the U.S.
    Weiss MJ
    Ethics Inf Technol; 2004; 6(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 16969961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prisoners' expectations of the national forensic DNA database: surveillance and reconfiguration of individual rights.
    Machado H; Santos F; Silva S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jul; 210(1-3):139-43. PubMed ID: 21414735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Have the police hijacked our DNA?
    Lancet; 2003 Sep; 362(9388):927. PubMed ID: 14511920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA profiles, computer searches, and the Fourth Amendment.
    Kimel CW
    Duke Law J; 2013; 62(4):933-73. PubMed ID: 23461001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention of offender DNA samples necessary to ensure and monitor quality of forensic DNA efforts: appropriate safeguards exist to protect the DNA samples from misuse.
    Herkenham MD
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 16789959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forensic DNA data banks: considerations for the health sector.
    Lakra R; Dimitriadis F
    Health Law Can; 2002 Feb; 22(3):57-70. PubMed ID: 11915589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DNA databanks: when has a good thing gone too far?
    Herlica DA
    Syracuse Law Rev; 2002; 52(3):951-77. PubMed ID: 15212076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National recommendations of the Technical UK DNA working group on mixture interpretation for the NDNAD and for court going purposes.
    Gill P; Brown RM; Fairley M; Lee L; Smyth M; Simpson N; Irwin B; Dunlop J; Greenhalgh M; Way K; Westacott EJ; Ferguson SJ; Ford LV; Clayton T; Guiness J;
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jan; 2(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 19083794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dangerous excursions: the case against expanding forensic DNA databases to innocent persons.
    Simoncelli T
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 16789961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Law and policy oversight of familial searches in recreational genealogy databases.
    Murphy E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Nov; 292():e5-e9. PubMed ID: 30287164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Universal forensic DNA databases: acceptable or illegal under the European Court of Human Rights regime?
    Tuazon OM
    J Law Biosci; 2021; 8(1):lsab022. PubMed ID: 34188945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.