These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29367318)

  • 1. Interactive visualisation for interpreting diagnostic test accuracy study results.
    Fanshawe TR; Power M; Graziadio S; Ordóñez-Mena JM; Simpson J; Allen J
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2018 Feb; 23(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 29367318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic testing, pre- and post-test probabilities, and their use in clinical practice.
    Paulo S; Mendes S; Vizinho R; Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1187-98. PubMed ID: 15587576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using and interpreting diagnostic tests.
    McKenna SL; Dohoo IR
    Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2006 Mar; 22(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 16517302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of patients' judgments of disease probability and test sensitivity and specificity.
    Hamm RM; Smith SL
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Jul; 47(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 9673608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Information provided by diagnostic and screening tests: improving probabilities.
    Weatherall M
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Apr; 94(1110):230-235. PubMed ID: 29133377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.
    Replogle WH; Johnson WD; Hoover KW
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 19413584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
    Eusebi P
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond the 2×2 -contingency table: a primer on entropies and mutual information in various scenarios involving m diagnostic categories and n categories of diagnostic tests.
    Reibnegger G
    Clin Chim Acta; 2013 Oct; 425():97-103. PubMed ID: 23886553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
    Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
    Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimum binary cut-off threshold of a diagnostic test: comparison of different methods using Monte Carlo technique.
    Reibnegger G; Schrabmair W
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Nov; 14():99. PubMed ID: 25421000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic methods I: sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of accuracy.
    van Stralen KJ; Stel VS; Reitsma JB; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Kidney Int; 2009 Jun; 75(12):1257-1263. PubMed ID: 19340091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Apr; 96(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 17306009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tools for critical appraisal of evidence in studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Giavarina D
    Autoimmun Rev; 2012 Dec; 12(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 22781590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probabilistic reporting of EUS-FNA cytology: Toward improved communication and better clinical decisions.
    Eltoum IA; Chen VK; Chhieng DC; Jhala D; Jhala NC; Crowe R; Varadarajulu S; Eloubeidi MA
    Cancer; 2006 Apr; 108(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 16444743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnostic accuracy].
    Simundić AM
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.
    Bianchi MT; Alexander BM; Cash SS
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 18812583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The channel capacity of a diagnostic test as a function of test sensitivity and test specificity.
    Benish WA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):1044-52. PubMed ID: 22368178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.