These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29368172)
1. Engendering Harm: A Critique of Sex Selection For "Family Balancing". Shahvisi A J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Mar; 15(1):123-137. PubMed ID: 29368172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Feminist Critique of Justifications for Sex Selection. Hendl T J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Sep; 14(3):427-438. PubMed ID: 28815468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing Non-Medical Sex Selection and Saviour Sibling Selection in the Case of JS and LS v Patient Review Panel: Beyond the Welfare of the Child? Smith MK; Taylor-Sands M J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Mar; 15(1):139-153. PubMed ID: 29396799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Procreative liberty: the case for preconception sex selection. Dahl E Reprod Biomed Online; 2003; 7(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 14656397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproductive Autonomy and Social Sex Selection: A Chance of a Choice? Boyd K J Law Med; 2018 Jul; 25(4):1106-1118. PubMed ID: 29978688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethics of sex selection for family balancing. Why balance families? Dawson K; Trounson A Hum Reprod; 1996 Dec; 11(12):2577-8. PubMed ID: 9021352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The ethics of sex selection and family balancing. Macklin R Semin Reprod Med; 2010 Jul; 28(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 20683795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sex selection: laissez faire or family balancing? Dahl E Health Care Anal; 2005 Mar; 13(1):87-90; discussion 91-3. PubMed ID: 15889684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 'Reproductive autonomy' versus public good? O'Neill O Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):646-7. PubMed ID: 16856229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The argument for unlimited procreative liberty: a feminist critique. Ryan MA Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):6-12. PubMed ID: 2211090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex selection and the procreative liberty framework. de Melo-MartÃn I Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2013 Mar; 23(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 23678627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The ethics of sex selection: a comparison of the attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians and physician providers of clinical sex selection services. Puri S; Nachtigall RD Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2107-14. PubMed ID: 19342036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Son preference, sex selection, and the "new" new reproductive technologies. van Balen F; Inhorn MC Int J Health Serv; 2003; 33(2):235-52. PubMed ID: 12800886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rights and procreative liberty. Schroeder D Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007; 16(3):325. PubMed ID: 17695626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection. McDougall R J Med Ethics; 2005 Oct; 31(10):601-5. PubMed ID: 16199604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selecting the traits of children prior to birth. Murphy TF Virtual Mentor; 2012 Feb; 14(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 23116959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The ethics of using genetic engineering for sex selection. Liao SM J Med Ethics; 2005 Feb; 31(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 15681683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chance, choice and control: lay debate on prenatal social sex selection. Scully JL; Banks S; Shakespeare TW Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jul; 63(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 16459006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Upsetting the balance on sex selection. Saunders B Bioethics; 2019 Nov; 33(9):1022-1028. PubMed ID: 31309598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]