These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29368228)
21. Are feeling-of-knowing and judgment-of-learning different? Evidence from older adults. Souchay C; Isingrini M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):458-64. PubMed ID: 22342997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Metamemory viewed through the judgment lens. Bröder A; Undorf M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():153-165. PubMed ID: 31158737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory. Kimball DR; Metcalfe J Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):918-29. PubMed ID: 14651299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Embodiment meets metamemory: weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments. Alban MW; Kelley CM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1628-34. PubMed ID: 23565793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Why do judgments of learning modify memory? Evidence from identical pairs and relatedness judgments. Halamish V; Undorf M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):547-556. PubMed ID: 36006723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Building metamemorial knowledge over time: insights from eye tracking about the bases of feeling-of-knowing and confidence judgments. Chua EF; Solinger LA Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1206. PubMed ID: 26347677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Metacognitive judgment formation during map learning: Evidence for global monitoring. Mason LA; Thomas AK; Taylor HA Cognition; 2024 May; 246():105743. PubMed ID: 38412761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention. Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Kubik V; Jönsson FU Scand J Psychol; 2012 Dec; 53(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 22897518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices. Toppino TC; Pagano MJ Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Judgments of Learning Reactivity on Item-Specific and Relational Processing. Chang M; Brainerd C J Intell; 2024 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 38248902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning. Metcalfe J; Finn B J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1084-97. PubMed ID: 18763893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice? Toppino TC; Heslin KA; Curley TM; Jackiewicz MK; Flowers CS; Phelan HA Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1423-1435. PubMed ID: 33770397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of metamemory after traumatic brain injury: predictions during verbal learning. Kennedy MR; Yorkston KM J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 43(5):1072-86. PubMed ID: 11063231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes. Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring. Weaver CA; Kelemen WL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing event-related potentials of retrospective and prospective metacognitive judgments during episodic and semantic memory. Irak M; Soylu C; Yavuz M Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):1949. PubMed ID: 36732355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retrieval Practice Facilitates Judgments of Learning Through Multiple Mechanisms: Simultaneous and Independent Contribution of Retrieval Confidence and Retrieval Fluency. Chen X; Zhang M; Liu XL Front Psychol; 2019; 10():987. PubMed ID: 31130901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Younger and older adults weigh multiple cues in a similar manner to generate judgments of learning. Hines JC; Hertzog C; Touron DR Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2015; 22(6):693-711. PubMed ID: 25827630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Working memory load differentially affects tip-of-the-tongue states and feeling-of-knowing judgments. Schwartz BL Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 18323058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning. Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]