422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29368375)
1. Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: Laboratory study.
Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; Mahmoud SH
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 May; 30(3):229-239. PubMed ID: 29368375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study.
Saridag S; Sevimay M; Pekkan G
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):626-34. PubMed ID: 23391033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations.
Seow LL; Toh CG; Wilson NH
J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 25448436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Preparation Design and Restorative Material on Fatigue and Fracture Strength of Restored Maxillary Premolars.
Hofsteenge JW; van den Heijkant IA; Cune MS; Bazos PK; van der Made S; Kerdijk W; Gresnigt M
Oper Dent; 2021 Mar; 46(2):E68-E79. PubMed ID: 34192333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
Desai PD; Das UK
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations.
Guess PC; Schultheis S; Wolkewitz M; Zhang Y; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 24079561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.
Vianna ALSV; Prado CJD; Bicalho AA; Pereira RADS; Neves FDD; Soares CJ
J Appl Oral Sci; 2018; 26():e20180004. PubMed ID: 30133672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with inlay and onlay ceramic restorations and luted with two different agents.
Cubas GB; Habekost L; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T
J Prosthodont Res; 2011 Jan; 55(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 20934401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance and failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored using ceramic onlays with or without fiber posts-an ex vivo study.
Keçeci AD; Heidemann D; Kurnaz S
Dent Traumatol; 2016 Aug; 32(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 26710085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials.
Brunton PA; Cattell P; Burke FJ; Wilson NH
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 10424979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of different endodontic access preparations on the biomechanical behavior of lithium disilicate and resin nanoceramic onlay restorations: An in vitro and 3D finite element analysis study.
Lai H; Lin X; Zhang Y; Gong Q; Tong Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 35216818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations.
St-Georges AJ; Sturdevant JR; Swift EJ; Thompson JY
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jun; 89(6):551-7. PubMed ID: 12815348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.
de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Inlays, Onlays and Endocrown Cavity Design Preparation on Fracture Resistance and Fracture Mode of Endodontically Treated Teeth: An In Vitro Study.
Kassis C; Khoury P; Mehanna CZ; Baba NZ; Bou Chebel F; Daou M; Hardan L
J Prosthodont; 2021 Aug; 30(7):625-631. PubMed ID: 33219727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of lab composite versus all-ceramic restorations in class II inlay cavity preparations: An
Bhanot S; Mahajan P; Bajaj N; Monga P; Sood A; Yadav R
J Conserv Dent; 2022; 25(3):258-263. PubMed ID: 35836565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of immediate dentine sealing on the fracture strength of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite inlay restorations.
van den Breemer CRG; Özcan M; Cune MS; van der Giezen R; Kerdijk W; Gresnigt MMM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Aug; 72():102-109. PubMed ID: 28477520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
