These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29368573)

  • 1. The risk of microbial contamination associated with six different needle-free connectors.
    Casey AL; Karpanen TJ; Nightingale P; Elliott TS
    Br J Nurs; 2018 Jan; 27(2):S18-S26. PubMed ID: 29368573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro comparison of standard cleaning to a continuous passive disinfection cap for the decontamination of needle-free connectors.
    Casey AL; Karpanen TJ; Nightingale P; Elliott TSJ
    Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2018; 7():50. PubMed ID: 29632665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro comparison of microbial ingress into 8 different needleless IV access devices.
    Casey A; Karpanen T; Nightingale P; Elliott T
    J Infus Nurs; 2015; 38(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 25545971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preventing central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections: development of an antiseptic barrier cap for needleless connectors.
    Menyhay SZ; Maki DG
    Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec; 36(10):S174.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19084153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disinfection of needleless catheter connectors and access ports with alcohol may not prevent microbial entry: the promise of a novel antiseptic-barrier cap.
    Menyhay SZ; Maki DG
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 16418982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective clinical trial to evaluate the microbial barrier of a needleless connector.
    Casey AL; Burnell S; Whinn H; Worthington T; Faroqui MH; Elliott TS
    J Hosp Infect; 2007 Mar; 65(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 17241691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized, prospective clinical trial to assess the potential infection risk associated with the PosiFlow needleless connector.
    Casey AL; Worthington T; Lambert PA; Quinn D; Faroqui MH; Elliott TS
    J Hosp Infect; 2003 Aug; 54(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 12919759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The potential for catheter microbial contamination from a needleless connector.
    Brown JD; Moss HA; Elliott TS
    J Hosp Infect; 1997 Jul; 36(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 9253699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Needle-free devices: keeping the system closed.
    Kelly LJ; Jones T; Kirkham S
    Br J Nurs; 2017 Jan; 26(2):S14-S19. PubMed ID: 28132546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of three different valve systems of needle-free closed connectors in avoiding access of microorganisms to endovascular catheters after incorrect handling.
    Yébenes JC; Delgado M; Sauca G; Serra-Prat M; Solsona M; Almirall J; Capdevila JA; Balanzó X
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Sep; 36(9):2558-61. PubMed ID: 18679126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical impact of needle-free connector design: A systematic review of literature.
    Rosenthal VD
    J Vasc Access; 2020 Nov; 21(6):847-853. PubMed ID: 32056487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microorganisms present on peripheral intravenous needleless connectors in the clinical environment.
    Slater K; Cooke M; Whitby M; Fullerton F; Douglas J; Hay J; Rickard C
    Am J Infect Control; 2017 Aug; 45(8):932-934. PubMed ID: 28330709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibration of optimal use parameters for an ultraviolet light-emitting diode in eliminating bacterial contamination on needleless connectors.
    Hutchens MP; Drennan SL; Cambronne ED
    J Appl Microbiol; 2015 Jun; 118(6):1298-305. PubMed ID: 25801979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microbiological comparison of a silver-coated and a non-coated needleless intravascular connector in clinical use.
    Casey AL; Karpanen TJ; Nightingale P; Cook M; Elliott TS
    J Hosp Infect; 2012 Apr; 80(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 22341495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adequate disinfection of a split-septum needleless intravascular connector with a 5-second alcohol scrub.
    Rupp ME; Yu S; Huerta T; Cavalieri RJ; Alter R; Fey PD; Van Schooneveld T; Anderson JR
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 33(7):661-5. PubMed ID: 22669226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of microbial contamination on the outer surface of needleless connectors before and after disinfection.
    Akbıyık A; Kaya S; Aksun M
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2023 Aug; 77():103414. PubMed ID: 36801154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating methods for the use and decontamination of needleless connectors: A qualitative inquiry.
    Larsen EN; August D; Keogh S; Flynn J; Ullman AJ; Marsh N; Cooke M; McCarthy AL; Rickard CM
    Infect Dis Health; 2022 Nov; 27(4):175-183. PubMed ID: 35739036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microbiologic evaluation of needleless and needle-access devices.
    Arduino MJ; Bland LA; Danzig LE; McAllister SK; Aguero SM
    Am J Infect Control; 1997 Oct; 25(5):377-80. PubMed ID: 9343619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripheral intravenous catheter needleless connector decontamination study-Randomized controlled trial.
    Slater K; Cooke M; Fullerton F; Whitby M; Hay J; Lingard S; Douglas J; Rickard CM
    Am J Infect Control; 2020 Sep; 48(9):1013-1018. PubMed ID: 31928890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective clinical study to investigate the microbial contamination ofa needleless connector.
    Seymour VM; Dhallu TS; Moss HA; Tebbs SE; Elliot TS
    J Hosp Infect; 2000 Jun; 45(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 10860694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.