673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29369109)
41. Muscle sparing-2 transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: a comparison with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.
Takeishi M; Fujimoto M; Ishida K; Makino Y
Microsurgery; 2008; 28(8):650-5. PubMed ID: 18844226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques.
Yueh JH; Slavin SA; Adesiyun T; Nyame TT; Gautam S; Morris DJ; Tobias AM; Lee BT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jun; 125(6):1585-1595. PubMed ID: 20517080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy Using Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap After Massive Weight Loss.
Dayicioglu D; Tugertimur B; Munzenmaier K; Khan M; Smith P; Murr M; Kumar A; Khakpour N
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jun; 76 Suppl 4():S286-9. PubMed ID: 26808755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.
Blondeel N; Vanderstraeten GG; Monstrey SJ; Van Landuyt K; Tonnard P; Lysens R; Boeckx WD; Matton G
Br J Plast Surg; 1997 Jul; 50(5):322-30. PubMed ID: 9245865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Bajaj AK; Chevray PM; Chang DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Mar; 117(3):737-46; discussion 747-50. PubMed ID: 16525258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction in patients with prior abdominal contouring procedures.
Jandali S; Nelson JA; Wu LC; Serletti JM
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2010 Nov; 26(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 20922654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Free versus the pedicled TRAM flap: a cost comparison and outcome analysis.
Serletti JM; Moran SL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Nov; 100(6):1418-24; discussion 1425-7. PubMed ID: 9385952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. unilateral reconstruction.
Selber JC; Nelson J; Fosnot J; Goldstein J; Bergey M; Sonnad SS; Serletti JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1142-1153. PubMed ID: 20885239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of outcomes and donor-site morbidity in unilateral free TRAM versus DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Schaverien MV; Perks AG; McCulley SJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(11):1219-24. PubMed ID: 17720644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A comparison study of deep muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction.
Tokumoto H; Akita S; Arai M; Kubota Y; Kuriyama M; Mitsukawa N
Microsurgery; 2019 Oct; 39(7):583-589. PubMed ID: 30806011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Myosonographic study of abdominal wall dynamics to assess donor site morbidity after microsurgical breast reconstruction with a DIEP or an ms-2 TRAM flap.
Seidenstuecker K; Legler U; Munder B; Andree C; Mahajan A; Witzel C
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 May; 69(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 27049776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Supercharging of delayed pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps, is it a viable option?
Vosburg RW; White MJ; Heckler FR
Microsurgery; 2015 Mar; 35(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 25065651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The cost effectiveness of the DIEP flap relative to the muscle-sparing TRAM flap in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
Krishnan NM; Purnell C; Nahabedian MY; Freed GL; Nigriny JF; Rosen JM; Rosson GD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Apr; 135(4):948-958. PubMed ID: 25811560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction.
Vyas RM; Dickinson BP; Fastekjian JH; Watson JP; DaLio AL; Crisera CA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):1519-1526. PubMed ID: 18453973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Donor-Site Hernia Repair in Abdominal Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Population-Based Cohort Study of 7929 Patients.
Mennie JC; Mohanna PN; O'Donoghue JM; Rainsbury R; Cromwell DA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jul; 136(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 25839173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A Comparative Study Between Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator and Thoracoacromial Venous Supercharged Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps.
Ayestaray B; Yonekura K; Motomura H; Ziade M
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jan; 76(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 26207537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Improving outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction: lessons learnt from 406 consecutive DIEP/TRAM flaps performed by a single surgeon.
Damen TH; Morritt AN; Zhong T; Ahmad J; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Aug; 66(8):1032-8. PubMed ID: 23642795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: a meta-analysis and critical review.
Man LX; Selber JC; Serletti JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Sep; 124(3):752-764. PubMed ID: 19342994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
