These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29369389)
1. The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism. Sauchelli A Bioethics; 2018 Mar; 32(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 29369389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Avoiding the Personhood Issue: Abortion, Identity, and Marquis's 'Future-Like-Ours' Argument. Reitan E Bioethics; 2016 May; 30(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 26424415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The parenthood argument. Simkulet W Bioethics; 2018 Jan; 32(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 29171657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Identity Objection to the future-like-ours argument. Brill S Bioethics; 2019 Feb; 33(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 30480832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Future-like-ours as a metaphysical reductio ad absurdum argument of personal identity. Chaffer TJ Bioethics; 2023 May; 37(4):367-373. PubMed ID: 36773306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the Identity Objection to the future-like-ours argument succeed? Blackshaw BP Bioethics; 2020 Feb; 34(2):203-206. PubMed ID: 31769884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marquis: a defense of abortion? Gelfand SD Bioethics; 2001 Apr; 15(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 11697378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Schrödinger's fetus examined. Blackshaw BP Med Health Care Philos; 2020 Jun; 23(2):321-323. PubMed ID: 31834552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Impairment Argument and Future-Like-Ours: A Problematic Dependence. Bobier C J Bioeth Inq; 2023 Sep; 20(3):353-357. PubMed ID: 37278912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion and the Epicurean challenge. Ekendahl K J Med Ethics; 2020 Apr; 46(4):273-274. PubMed ID: 31630130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can the Future-Like-Ours Argument Survive Ontological Scrutiny? Adams M; Rimell N J Med Philos; 2022 Nov; 47(5):667-680. PubMed ID: 34655219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument. Hendricks P Bioethics; 2019 Feb; 33(2):245-253. PubMed ID: 30480820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A critique of "the best secular argument against abortion". Strong C J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):727-31. PubMed ID: 18827103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parthenogenesis, identity, and value. Simkulet W Bioethics; 2024 Jun; 38(5):419-424. PubMed ID: 38652592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures. Brown MT J Med Ethics; 2000 Apr; 26(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 10786320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to 'Abortion and Deprivation'. Colgrove N J Med Ethics; 2019 Jun; 45(6):380-383. PubMed ID: 31189723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to Christensen. Blackshaw BP; Rodger D J Med Ethics; 2019 Jul; 45(7):478-479. PubMed ID: 30772840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis. Christensen A J Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 45(1):22-25. PubMed ID: 30429204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A future like ours revisited. Brown MT J Med Ethics; 2002 Jun; 28(3):192-5; discussion 202. PubMed ID: 12042408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The future-like-ours argument, personal identity, and the twinning dilemma. Brill HS Soc Theory Pract; 2003 Jul; 29(3):419-30. PubMed ID: 14696604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]