123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29369505)
1. Age-related change and sex difference over 60s in disc-fovea angle in Japanese population: the Nagahama Study.
Miyata M; Yoshikawa M; Ohtsuki H; Muraoka Y; Hata M; Yokota S; Fujimoto M; Miyake M; Tabara Y; Matsuda F; Yoshimura N;
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e840-e845. PubMed ID: 29369505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optic Disc - Fovea Angle: The Beijing Eye Study 2011.
Jonas RA; Wang YX; Yang H; Li JJ; Xu L; Panda-Jonas S; Jonas JB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141771. PubMed ID: 26545259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disc-foveal angle and ocular counterrolling as a key in its interpretation.
Vélez Escolà L; Galán Terraza A; Lagrèze WA; Martín Begué N; Puig Galy J; Velázquez Villoria D; Arcos Algaba G; Mora Ramírez D; García-Arumí J
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed); 2019 Dec; 94(12):585-590. PubMed ID: 31582183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the disc-fovea angle on limits of RNFL variability and glaucoma discrimination.
Amini N; Nowroozizadeh S; Cirineo N; Henry S; Chang T; Chou T; Coleman AL; Caprioli J; Nouri-Mahdavi K
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 55(11):7332-42. PubMed ID: 25301880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo adaptive optics imaging of the temporal raphe and its relationship to the optic disc and fovea in the human retina.
Huang G; Gast TJ; Burns SA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Aug; 55(9):5952-61. PubMed ID: 25146991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Location of Parapapillary Gamma Zone and Vertical Fovea Location. The Beijing Eye Study 2011.
Jonas RA; Brandt CF; Zhang Q; Wang YX; Jonas JB
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2021 Jan; 62(1):18. PubMed ID: 33464277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of disc-fovea angle and retinal blood vessels on interindividual variability of circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer.
Resch H; Pereira I; Hienert J; Weber S; Holzer S; Kiss B; Fischer G; Vass C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 100(4):531-6. PubMed ID: 26269535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimal detectable change of the disc-fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment.
Piedrahita-Alonso E; Valverde-Megias A; Martin-Garcia B; Hernandez-Garcia E; Gomez-de-Liano R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Jan; 42(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 34622963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and Reliability of Semiautomatic Ocular Cycloposition Measurement With Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography.
Piedrahita-Alonso E; Valverde-Megias A; Gomez-de-Liano R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 222():248-255. PubMed ID: 32918904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of the relative positioning between the disc-fovea angle and localized optic disc defects on the 10-2 visual field results in glaucoma.
Matos AG; De Moraes CG; Pinto TT; Silva MJL; Paula JS
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2018; 1(3):175-181. PubMed ID: 31737863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of the location of the fovea on the fundus.
Rohrschneider K
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3257-8. PubMed ID: 15326148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rotation of retinal vascular arcades and comparison with disc-fovea angle in the assessment of cycloposition.
Piedrahita-Alonso E; Valverde-Megias A; Gomez-de-Liano R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 98(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 24169655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective excyclotorsion increases with aging in adults.
Oohira A
Strabismus; 2022 Dec; 30(4):183-189. PubMed ID: 36164779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optic Disc-Fovea Distance, Axial Length and Parapapillary Zones. The Beijing Eye Study 2011.
Jonas RA; Wang YX; Yang H; Li JJ; Xu L; Panda-Jonas S; Jonas JB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138701. PubMed ID: 26390438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Adjusting Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Profile to Fovea-Disc Angle Axis on the Thickness and Glaucoma Diagnostic Performance.
Mwanza JC; Lee G; Budenz DL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 161():12-21.e1-2. PubMed ID: 26387935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of subjective cyclofusion ranges and objective ocular torsion in normal participants according to age.
Kawai M; Goseki T; Okano T; Ishikawa H
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 260(11):3675-3681. PubMed ID: 35708848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining the Location of the Fovea Centralis Via En-Face SLO and Cross-Sectional OCT Imaging in Patients Without Retinal Pathology.
Nair AA; Liebenthal R; Sood S; Hom GL; Ohlhausen ME; Conti TF; Valentim CCS; Ishikawa H; Wollstein G; Schuman JS; Singh RP; Modi YS
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Feb; 10(2):25. PubMed ID: 34003910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Morphological parameters of the posterior pole in a high myopia population aged over 40 years: a 10-year follow-up study].
Yan YN; Wang YX; Wei WB
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 57(12):908-915. PubMed ID: 34865449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beta-peripapillary atrophy of the optic disc and its determinants in Japanese eyes: a population-based study.
Mataki N; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Iwase A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 96(6):e701-e706. PubMed ID: 29575565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring normal ocular torsion and its variation by fundus photography in children between 5-15 years of age.
Jethani J; Seethapathy G; Purohit J; Shah D
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2010; 58(5):417-9. PubMed ID: 20689198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
