These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29369682)

  • 1. Attention goes both ways: Shifting attention influences lexical decisions.
    Mills M; Boychuk P; Chasteen AL; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Feb; 147(2):282-291. PubMed ID: 29369682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thinking of God moves attention.
    Chasteen AL; Burdzy DC; Pratt J
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):627-30. PubMed ID: 19804790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors.
    Gozli DG; Pratt J; Martin KZ; Chasteen AL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150928. PubMed ID: 26953570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention.
    Grosbras MH; Paus T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1109-20. PubMed ID: 12419133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the previous trial affect lateralized lexical decision?
    Iacoboni M; Rayman J; Zaidel E
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Jan; 35(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 8981380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Obama cares about visuo-spatial attention: perception of political figures moves attention and determines gaze direction.
    Mills M; Smith KB; Hibbing JR; Dodd MD
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():221-5. PubMed ID: 25300469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bow Your Head in Shame, or, Hold Your Head Up with Pride: Semantic Processing of Self-Esteem Concepts Orients Attention Vertically.
    Taylor JE; Lam TK; Chasteen AL; Pratt J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137704. PubMed ID: 26368276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thinking about the future moves attention to the right.
    Ouellet M; Santiago J; Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 20121292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objects but not concepts modulate the size of the attended region.
    Goodhew SC; Edwards M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1353-1365. PubMed ID: 27118329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of task structure on category priming in patients with Parkinson's disease and in healthy individuals.
    Brown GG; Brown SJ; Christenson G; Williams RE; Kindermann SS; Loftis C; Olsen R; Siple P; Shults C; Gorell JM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2002 May; 24(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 11992217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moving along the mental number line: Interactions between whole-body motion and numerical cognition.
    Hartmann M; Grabherr L; Mast FW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1416-27. PubMed ID: 22201471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Covert orienting of attention in macaques. II. Contributions of parietal cortex.
    Robinson DL; Bowman EM; Kertzman C
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Aug; 74(2):698-712. PubMed ID: 7472375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in trunk orientation do not induce asymmetries in covert orienting.
    Westwood DA; Jones SA; Cowper-Smith CD; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1193-205. PubMed ID: 23666630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanisms of moving the mind's eye: planning and execution of spatial shifts of attention.
    Hazlett CJ; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 15200702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does each hemisphere monitor the ongoing process in the contralateral one?
    Hochman EY; Eviatar Z
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 15177804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.