These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29370581)

  • 1. The effects of two assistive technologies on reading comprehension accuracy and rate.
    Schmitt AJ; McCallum E; Hawkins RO; Stephenson E; Vicencio K
    Assist Technol; 2019; 31(4):220-230. PubMed ID: 29370581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of text-to-speech features on the reading comprehension of children with reading and language difficulties.
    Keelor JL; Creaghead NA; Silbert NH; Breit AD; Horowitz-Kraus T
    Ann Dyslexia; 2023 Oct; 73(3):469-486. PubMed ID: 37119436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of text-to-speech software use on the reading proficiency of high school struggling readers.
    Park HJ; Takahashi K; Roberts KD; Delise D
    Assist Technol; 2017; 29(3):146-152. PubMed ID: 27184520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Text-to-speech technology effects on reading rate and comprehension by adults with traumatic brain injury.
    Harvey J; Hux K; Scott N; Snell J
    Brain Inj; 2013; 27(12):1388-94. PubMed ID: 24102239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does Use of Text-to-Speech and Related Read-Aloud Tools Improve Reading Comprehension for Students With Reading Disabilities? A Meta-Analysis.
    Wood SG; Moxley JH; Tighe EL; Wagner RK
    J Learn Disabil; 2018; 51(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 28112580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The intelligibility and comprehension of synthetic
    Giannouli V; Banou M
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Nov; 15(8):898-907. PubMed ID: 31339391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assistive technology applications for students with reading difficulties: special education teachers' experiences and perceptions.
    Nordström T; Nilsson S; Gustafson S; Svensson I
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Nov; 14(8):798-808. PubMed ID: 30239256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reading Comprehension and Processing Time When People With Aphasia Use Text-to-Speech Technology With Personalized Supports and Features.
    Knollman-Porter K; Brown JA; Hux K; Wallace SE; Crittenden A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2022 Jan; 31(1):342-358. PubMed ID: 34941376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Text-to-speech accommodations for the reading challenges of adults with traumatic brain injury.
    Harvey J; Hux K
    Brain Inj; 2015; 29(7-8):888-97. PubMed ID: 25955116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comprehension, Processing Time, and Modality Preferences When People With Aphasia and Neurotypical Healthy Adults Read Books: A Pilot Study.
    Knollman-Porter K; Hux K; Wallace SE; Pruitt M; Hughes MR; Brown JA
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2022 Nov; 31(6):2569-2590. PubMed ID: 36167067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of a Partial Read-Aloud Test Accommodation to Assess Reading Comprehension in Students With a Reading Disability.
    Giusto M; Ehri LC
    J Learn Disabil; 2019; 52(3):259-270. PubMed ID: 30035685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reading behaviors and text-to-speech technology perceptions of people with aphasia.
    Wallace SE; Hux K; Knollman-Porter K; Brown JA; Parisi E; Cain R
    Assist Technol; 2022 Sep; 34(5):599-610. PubMed ID: 33724912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of people with aphasia about supporting reading with text-to-speech technology: A convergent mixed methods study.
    Hux K; Wallace SE; Brown JA; Knollman-Porter K
    J Commun Disord; 2021; 91():106098. PubMed ID: 33744768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and feasibility analysis of an assistance system for high school students with dyslexia.
    Rodriguez-Goncalves R; Garcia-Crespo A; Ruiz-Arroyo A; Matheus-Chacin C
    Res Dev Disabil; 2021 Apr; 111():103892. PubMed ID: 33578231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye Fixation Behaviors and Processing Time of People With Aphasia and Neurotypical Adults When Reading Narratives With and Without Text-to-Speech Support.
    Knollman-Porter K; Bevelhimer A; Hux K; Wallace SE; Hughes MR; Brown JA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 66(1):276-295. PubMed ID: 36538505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of fast-rate, slow-rate, and silent previewing interventions on reading performance.
    Skinner CH; Adamson KL; Woodward JR; Jackson RR; Atchison LA; Mims JW
    J Learn Disabil; 1993 Dec; 26(10):674-81. PubMed ID: 8151207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the benefits of assistive reading software: perceptions of high school students with learning disabilities.
    Chiang HY; Liu CH
    Assist Technol; 2011; 23(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 22256668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Digital Highlighting on Reading Comprehension Given Text-to-Speech Technology for People with Aphasia.
    Brown JA; Knollman-Porter K; Hux K; Wallace SE; Deville C
    Aphasiology; 2021; 35(2):200-221. PubMed ID: 33731970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computerized trainings in four groups of struggling readers: Specific effects on word reading and comprehension.
    Potocki A; Magnan A; Ecalle J
    Res Dev Disabil; 2015; 45-46():83-92. PubMed ID: 26233762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing Accessibility for Students With Decoding Difficulties on Large-Scale Reading Assessments.
    Gandhi AG; Ogut B; Stein L; Bzura R; Danielson L
    J Learn Disabil; 2018; 51(6):540-551. PubMed ID: 28613114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.