338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29371174)
1. Surgical Outcomes of Paravaginal Repair After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
Hoke TP; Goldstein H; Saks EK; Vakili B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):892-895. PubMed ID: 29371174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between laparoscopic uterus/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Wei D; Wang P; Niu X; Zhao X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Apr; 45(4):915-922. PubMed ID: 30652385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus.
Bradley MS; Askew AL; Vaughan MH; Kawasaki A; Visco AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):514.e1-514.e8. PubMed ID: 29425837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Paravaginal Repair and Sacrocolpopexy in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Kim WB; Lee SW; Lee KW; Kim JM; Kim YH; Chung SH; Nam K
Urology; 2022 Jun; 164():151-156. PubMed ID: 34968573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure.
Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Mueller MG; Jacobs KM; Mueller ER; Abernethy MG; Kenton KS
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 27054799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes.
Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 21458389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-term outcomes of single port robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy.
Ashmore S; Kenton K; Collins S; Geynisman-Tan J; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG
J Robot Surg; 2024 Jun; 18(1):260. PubMed ID: 38904835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
