These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29372304)

  • 1. Multiple reward-cue contingencies favor expectancy over uncertainty in shaping the reward-cue attentional salience.
    De Tommaso M; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
    Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):332-346. PubMed ID: 29372304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The salience of a reward cue can outlast reward devaluation.
    De Tommaso M; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
    Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 131(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 28471221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the resilience of reward cues attentional salience to reward devaluation, time, incentive learning, and contingency remapping.
    De Tommaso M; Turatto M
    Behav Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 135(3):389-401. PubMed ID: 33914569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Under the influence: Effects of adolescent ethanol exposure and anxiety on motivation for uncertain gambling-like cues in male and female rats.
    Hellberg SN; Levit JD; Robinson MJF
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 337():17-33. PubMed ID: 28958752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reward Draws the Eye, Uncertainty Holds the Eye: Associative Learning Modulates Distractor Interference in Visual Search.
    Koenig S; Kadel H; Uengoer M; Schubö A; Lachnit H
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2017; 11():128. PubMed ID: 28744206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing reward-cue attentional salience: Attainment and dynamic changes.
    De Tommaso M; Turatto M
    Br J Psychol; 2022 May; 113(2):396-411. PubMed ID: 34708867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. See it, grab it, or STOP! Relationships between trait impulsivity, attentional bias for pictorial food cues and associated response inhibition following in-vivo food cue exposure.
    Lattimore P; Mead BR
    Appetite; 2015 Jul; 90():248-53. PubMed ID: 25817482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The modulation of value-driven attentional capture by exploration for reward information.
    Ju J; Cho YS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Feb; 49(2):181-197. PubMed ID: 36265043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In monkeys making value-based decisions, amygdala neurons are sensitive to cue value as distinct from cue salience.
    Leathers ML; Olson CR
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Apr; 117(4):1499-1511. PubMed ID: 28077664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction and uncertainty in associative learning: examining controlled and automatic components of learned attentional biases.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA; Le Pelley ME; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1485-1503. PubMed ID: 27174735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response differences in monkey TE and perirhinal cortex: stimulus association related to reward schedules.
    Liu Z; Richmond BJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Mar; 83(3):1677-92. PubMed ID: 10712488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the relationship between value-driven and stimulus-driven attentional capture.
    Anderson BA; Kim H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):607-613. PubMed ID: 30697647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of temporal contingencies between cue and target onset on spatial attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.
    Schoeberl T; Ansorge U
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1416-1425. PubMed ID: 29766295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategic top-down control versus attentional bias by previous reward history.
    Lynn J; Shin M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2207-16. PubMed ID: 26041273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive cues and spatial attentional bias for alcohol: Manipulations of cue-outcome mapping.
    Gladwin TE; Banic M; Figner B; Vink M
    Addict Behav; 2020 Apr; 103():106247. PubMed ID: 31838446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the timing of overt attention deployment: Eye-movement evidence for the priority accumulation framework.
    Toledano D; Sasi M; Yuval-Greenberg S; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 May; 50(5):431-450. PubMed ID: 38421794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An omission procedure reorganizes the microstructure of sign-tracking while preserving incentive salience.
    Chang SE; Smith KS
    Learn Mem; 2016 Apr; 23(4):151-5. PubMed ID: 26980782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mixed signals: The effect of conflicting reward- and goal-driven biases on selective attention.
    Preciado D; Munneke J; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1297-1310. PubMed ID: 28439793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaction between value and perceptual salience in value-driven attentional capture.
    Wang L; Yu H; Zhou X
    J Vis; 2013 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23479463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monocular channels have a functional role in phasic alertness and temporal expectancy.
    Saban W; Weinbach N; Gabay S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):752-763. PubMed ID: 30628033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.