283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29372512)
1. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.
Augustinova M; Clarys D; Spatola N; Ferrand L
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):767-774. PubMed ID: 29372512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in the Stroop task: New evidence from the two-to-one Stroop paradigm.
Burca M; Chausse P; Ferrand L; Parris BA; Augustinova M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):492-500. PubMed ID: 34595729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals.
Augustinova M; Silvert L; Spatola N; Ferrand L
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():54-62. PubMed ID: 28407872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is There Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task?
Burca M; Beaucousin V; Chausse P; Ferrand L; Parris BA; Augustinova M
Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 68(5):274-283. PubMed ID: 34911356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stroop interference is a composite phenomenon: Evidence from distinct developmental trajectories of its components.
Ferrand L; Ducrot S; Chausse P; Maïonchi-Pino N; O'Connor RJ; Parris BA; Perret P; Riggs KJ; Augustinova M
Dev Sci; 2020 Mar; 23(2):e12899. PubMed ID: 31483912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When Conflict Cannot be Avoided: Relative Contributions of Early Selection and Frontal Executive Control in Mitigating Stroop Conflict.
Itthipuripat S; Deering S; Serences JT
Cereb Cortex; 2019 Dec; 29(12):5037-5048. PubMed ID: 30877786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Goal-neglect links Stroop interference with working memory capacity.
Morey CC; Elliott EM; Wiggers J; Eaves SD; Shelton JT; Mall JT
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 22749714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Common and specific loci of Stroop effects in vocal and manual tasks, revealed by event-related brain potentials and posthypnotic suggestions.
Zahedi A; Abdel Rahman R; Stürmer B; Sommer W
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1575-1594. PubMed ID: 30730196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks.
Scaltritti M; Job R; Sulpizio S
Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):898-910. PubMed ID: 35040025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The neural mechanisms of semantic and response conflicts: an fMRI study of practice-related effects in the Stroop task.
Chen Z; Lei X; Ding C; Li H; Chen A
Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 66():577-84. PubMed ID: 23103691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response Time Distribution Analysis of Semantic and Response Interference in a Manual Response Stroop Task.
Hasshim N; Downes M; Bate S; Parris BA
Exp Psychol; 2019 May; 66(3):231-238. PubMed ID: 31266430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term habitual physical activity is associated with lower distractibility in a Stroop interference task in aging: Behavioral and ERP evidence.
Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
Brain Cogn; 2015 Aug; 98():87-101. PubMed ID: 26160263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task.
Augustinova M; Silvert L; Ferrand L; Llorca PM; Flaudias V
Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 25092389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship of regular physical activity with neuroelectric indices of interference processing in young adults.
Aly M; Kojima H
Psychophysiology; 2020 Dec; 57(12):e13674. PubMed ID: 33460156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task.
Hershman R; Henik A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 30816765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
Kinoshita S; Mills L; Norris D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load.
Kalanthroff E; Avnit A; Henik A; Davelaar EJ; Usher M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):869-75. PubMed ID: 25257710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures.
Hasshim N; Parris BA
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2601-10. PubMed ID: 26272367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
Augustinova M; Ferrand L
Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
