These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29372512)

  • 21. The loci of Stroop effects: a critical review of methods and evidence for levels of processing contributing to color-word Stroop effects and the implications for the loci of attentional selection.
    Parris BA; Hasshim N; Wadsley M; Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Psychol Res; 2022 Jun; 86(4):1029-1053. PubMed ID: 34389901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():411-418. PubMed ID: 30562575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electrophysiological explorations of the bilingual advantage: evidence from a Stroop task.
    Coderre EL; van Heuven WJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e103424. PubMed ID: 25068723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.
    Manwell LA; Roberts MA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):458-62. PubMed ID: 15376795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1259-1286. PubMed ID: 38691237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reward expectation modulates multiple stages of auditory conflict control.
    Kang G; Chang W; Wang L; Zhou X
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():148-156. PubMed ID: 31648025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cross-modal interference-control is reduced in childhood but maintained in aging: A cohort study of stimulus- and response-interference in cross-modal and unimodal Stroop tasks.
    Hirst RJ; Kicks EC; Allen HA; Cragg L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):553-572. PubMed ID: 30945905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Coloring only a single letter does not eliminate color-word interference in a vocal-response Stroop task: automaticity revealed.
    Marmurek HH
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 12773021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Brain oscillations in cognitive control: A cross-sectional study with a spatial stroop task.
    Tafuro A; Ambrosini E; Puccioni O; Vallesi A
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Oct; 133():107190. PubMed ID: 31513806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dissociated stimulus and response conflict effect in the Stroop task: evidence from evoked brain potentials and brain oscillations.
    Zhao J; Liang WK; Juan CH; Wang L; Wang S; Zhu Z
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():130-8. PubMed ID: 25511611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect.
    Shichel I; Tzelgov J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():93-102. PubMed ID: 29078981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finding an interaction between Stroop congruency and flanker congruency requires a large congruency effect: A within-trial combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2271-2301. PubMed ID: 31974936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Virtual Apartment-Based Stroop for assessing distractor inhibition in healthy aging.
    Parsons TD; Barnett M
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2019; 26(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28976213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reduced Stroop interference under stress: Decreased cue utilisation, not increased executive control.
    Booth RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1522-1529. PubMed ID: 30304992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conflict monitoring on an emotional Stroop task. Comparison of healthy older adults and patients with major neurocognitive disorders due to probable AD.
    Satorres E; Oliva I; Escudero J; Meléndez JC
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Jul; 42(5):485-494. PubMed ID: 32354296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin.
    van Maanen L; van Rijn H; Borst JP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Dec; 16(6):987-99. PubMed ID: 19966248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference.
    Ferrand L; Augustinova M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):425-31. PubMed ID: 24002970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return.
    Chen Q; Wei P; Zhou X
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1937-46. PubMed ID: 17069483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An emotional Stroop task with faces and words. A comparison of young and older adults.
    Agustí AI; Satorres E; Pitarque A; Meléndez JC
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Aug; 53():99-104. PubMed ID: 28654840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.