266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29373745)
1. Modeling heterotic effects in beef cattle using genome-wide SNP-marker genotypes.
Akanno EC; Abo-Ismail MK; Chen L; Crowley JJ; Wang Z; Li C; Basarab JA; MacNeil MD; Plastow GS
J Anim Sci; 2018 Apr; 96(3):830-845. PubMed ID: 29373745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genome-wide association scan for heterotic quantitative trait loci in multi-breed and crossbred beef cattle.
Akanno EC; Chen L; Abo-Ismail MK; Crowley JJ; Wang Z; Li C; Basarab JA; MacNeil MD; Plastow GS
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Oct; 50(1):48. PubMed ID: 30290764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of breed and heterosis effects for growth and carcass traits in cattle using published crossbreeding studies.
Williams JL; Aguilar I; Rekaya R; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):460-6. PubMed ID: 19820043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic clustering helps to improve prediction in a multibreed population.
Ventura R; Larmer S; Schenkel FS; Miller SP; Sullivan P
J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1844-56. PubMed ID: 27285682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits of beef cattle using 50K and imputed HD genotypes.
Lu D; Akanno EC; Crowley JJ; Schenkel F; Li H; De Pauw M; Moore SS; Wang Z; Li C; Stothard P; Plastow G; Miller SP; Basarab JA
J Anim Sci; 2016 Apr; 94(4):1342-53. PubMed ID: 27135994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genome-wide association study of growth in crossbred beef cattle.
Snelling WM; Allan MF; Keele JW; Kuehn LA; McDaneld T; Smith TP; Sonstegard TS; Thallman RM; Bennett GL
J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):837-48. PubMed ID: 19966163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breed of origin analysis in genome-wide association studies: enhancing SNP-based insights into production traits in a commercial Brangus population.
Zayas GA; Rodriguez E; Hernandez A; Rezende FM; Mateescu RG
BMC Genomics; 2024 Jul; 25(1):654. PubMed ID: 38956457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multi-breed genomic evaluation for tropical beef cattle when no pedigree information is available.
Hayes BJ; Copley J; Dodd E; Ross EM; Speight S; Fordyce G
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Oct; 55(1):71. PubMed ID: 37845626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic parameters, heterosis, and breed effects for body condition score and mature cow weight in beef cattle.
Ribeiro AMF; Sanglard LP; Snelling WM; Thallman RM; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35044465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of genomic prediction when combining two related crossbred populations.
Vallée A; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4342-8. PubMed ID: 25149337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle.
Rolf MM; Garrick DJ; Fountain T; Ramey HR; Weaber RL; Decker JE; Pollak EJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 25884158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
Gunia M; Saintilan R; Venot E; Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Phocas F
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3258-69. PubMed ID: 24948648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local breed proportions and local breed heterozygosity in genomic predictions for crossbred dairy cows.
Eiríksson JH; Strandén I; Su G; Mäntysaari EA; Christensen OF
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Nov; 105(12):9822-9836. PubMed ID: 36307242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementing a genomic rotational crossbreeding scheme to promote local dairy cattle breeds-A simulation study.
Stock J; Esfandyari H; Hinrichs D; Bennewitz J
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):6873-6884. PubMed ID: 33773793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards multi-breed genomic evaluations for female fertility of tropical beef cattle.
Hayes BJ; Corbet NJ; Allen JM; Laing AR; Fordyce G; Lyons R; McGowan MR; Burns BM
J Anim Sci; 2019 Jan; 97(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 30371787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of molecular breeding values for Warner-Bratzler shear force and carcass traits of beef cattle - an independent validation study.
Akanno EC; Plastow G; Woodward BW; Bauck S; Okut H; Wu XL; Sun C; Aalhus JL; Moore SS; Miller SP; Wang Z; Basarab JA
J Anim Sci; 2014 Jul; 92(7):2896-904. PubMed ID: 24802042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of clustering methods for cross-validation, choice of phenotypes, and genotyping strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictions.
Baller JL; Howard JT; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1534-1549. PubMed ID: 30721970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
