These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29374491)
1. Prosthetic energy return during walking increases after 3 weeks of adaptation to a new device. Ray SF; Wurdeman SR; Takahashi KZ J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 15(1):6. PubMed ID: 29374491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Step-to-step transition work during level and inclined walking using passive and powered ankle-foot prostheses. Russell Esposito E; Aldridge Whitehead JM; Wilken JM Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 25628378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing stiffness of shock-absorbing pylon amplifies prosthesis energy loss and redistributes joint mechanical work during walking. Maun JA; Gard SA; Major MJ; Takahashi KZ J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Sep; 18(1):143. PubMed ID: 34548080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Energetic consequences of using a prosthesis with adaptive ankle motion during slope walking in persons with a transtibial amputation. Darter BJ; Wilken JM Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Feb; 38(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 23525888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the unaffected leg during level-ground walking. Grabowski AM; D'Andrea S J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Jun; 10():49. PubMed ID: 23758860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of prosthetic foot stiffness on transtibial amputee walking mechanics and balance control during turning. Shell CE; Segal AD; Klute GK; Neptune RR Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 Nov; 49():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kinetic differences between level walking and ramp descent in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation using a prosthetic knee without a stance control mechanism. Okita Y; Yamasaki N; Nakamura T; Kubo T; Mitsumoto A; Akune T Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():80-85. PubMed ID: 29723652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking. Lamers EP; Eveld ME; Zelik KE J Biomech; 2019 Oct; 95():109273. PubMed ID: 31431348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Continuous relative phases of walking with an articulated passive ankle-foot prosthesis in individuals with a unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputation: an explorative case-control study. Lathouwers E; Baeyens JP; Tassignon B; Gomez F; Cherelle P; Meeusen R; Vanderborght B; De Pauw K Biomed Eng Online; 2023 Feb; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 36793091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation. Segal AD; Zelik KE; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Adamczyk PG; Collins SH; Kuo AD; Czerniecki JM Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Aug; 31(4):918-31. PubMed ID: 22100728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot. Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of push-off timing in a robotic ankle-foot prosthesis on the energetics and mechanics of walking. Malcolm P; Quesada RE; Caputo JM; Collins SH J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Feb; 12():21. PubMed ID: 25889201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic Assessment of Prosthesis Stiffness on User Biomechanics Using the Lower Leg Trajectory Error Framework and Its Implication for the Design and Evaluation of Ankle-Foot Prostheses. Prost V; Johnson WB; Kent JA; Major MJ; Winter AG J Biomech Eng; 2023 Apr; 145(4):. PubMed ID: 36346192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Energy expenditure in people with transtibial amputation walking with crossover and energy storing prosthetic feet: A randomized within-subject study. McDonald CL; Kramer PA; Morgan SJ; Halsne EG; Cheever SM; Hafner BJ Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():349-354. PubMed ID: 29614468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole-body angular momentum during sloped walking using passive and powered lower-limb prostheses. Pickle NT; Wilken JM; Aldridge Whitehead JM; Silverman AK J Biomech; 2016 Oct; 49(14):3397-3406. PubMed ID: 27670646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiation between solid-ankle cushioned heel and energy storage and return prosthetic foot based on step-to-step transition cost. Wezenberg D; Cutti AG; Bruno A; Houdijk H J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(10):1579-90. PubMed ID: 25860285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical accommodation to walking with an ankle-foot prosthesis: An exploratory analysis of novice users with transtibial limb loss within the first year of ambulation. Mahon CE; Hendershot BD Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Oct; 46(5):452-458. PubMed ID: 35333820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of push-off and collision work during step-to-step transition in amputees walking at self-selected speed: Effect of amputation level. Sedran L; Bonnet X; Thomas-Pohl M; Loiret I; Martinet N; Pillet H; Paysant J J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 163():111943. PubMed ID: 38244403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toe clearance when walking in people with unilateral transtibial amputation: effects of passive hydraulic ankle. Johnson L; De Asha AR; Munjal R; Kulkarni J; Buckley JG J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 25019665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptions and biomechanical effects of varying prosthetic ankle stiffness during uphill walking: A case series. Ármannsdóttir AL; Lecomte C; Lemaire E; Brynjólfsson S; Briem K Gait Posture; 2024 Feb; 108():354-360. PubMed ID: 38227995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]