These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29374750)

  • 1. Analytical Methods for Quantification of Vitamin D and Implications for Research and Clinical Practice.
    Stokes CS; Lammert F; Volmer DA
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Feb; 38(2):1137-1144. PubMed ID: 29374750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Road Not So Travelled: Should Measurement of Vitamin D Epimers during Pregnancy Affect Our Clinical Decisions?
    Karras SN; Kotsa K; Angeloudi E; Zebekakis P; Naughton DP
    Nutrients; 2017 Jan; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 28134839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vitamin D: Current Guidelines and Future Outlook.
    Pilz S; Trummer C; Pandis M; Schwetz V; Aberer F; Grübler M; Verheyen N; Tomaschitz A; März W
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Feb; 38(2):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 29374751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical diagnostic tools for vitamin D assessment.
    Shah I; Akhtar MK; Hisaindee S; Rauf MA; Sadig M; Ashraf SS
    J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 2018 Jun; 180():105-117. PubMed ID: 28988826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Biological markers for the status of vitamins B12 and D: the importance of some analytical aspects in relation to clinical interpretation of results].
    Boulat O; Rey F; Mooser V
    Rev Med Suisse; 2012 Oct; 8(360):2052-4, 2056-8. PubMed ID: 23185926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The need for vitamin D assay standardisation in research.
    Hodge AM
    Public Health Nutr; 2020 Dec; 23(18):3283. PubMed ID: 32981564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical, Research, and Public Health Implications of Poor Measurement of Vitamin D Status.
    Lucas RM; Gorman S; Black L; Neale RE
    J AOAC Int; 2017 Sep; 100(5):1225-1229. PubMed ID: 28492144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vitamin D testing: advantages and limits of the current assays.
    Altieri B; Cavalier E; Bhattoa HP; Pérez-López FR; López-Baena MT; Pérez-Roncero GR; Chedraui P; Annweiler C; Della Casa S; Zelzer S; Herrmann M; Faggiano A; Colao A; Holick MF
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2020 Feb; 74(2):231-247. PubMed ID: 31907366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vitamin D status in growing children: should we routinely screen for vitamin D adequacy?
    Mimouni FB
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2010 Dec; 51 Suppl 3():S121-2. PubMed ID: 21088529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analytic challenges in monitoring vitamin D therapy.
    Kolatkar NS; LeBoff MS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Mar; 127(3):472-3. PubMed ID: 17385247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D assay standardisation and vitamin D guidelines paralysis.
    Sempos CT; Binkley N
    Public Health Nutr; 2020 May; 23(7):1153-1164. PubMed ID: 32301688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vitamin D: methods of 25 hydroxyvitamin D analysis, targeting at risk populations and selecting thresholds of treatment.
    Glendenning P; Inderjeeth CA
    Clin Biochem; 2012 Aug; 45(12):901-6. PubMed ID: 22522083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revolutionary advances in the diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency.
    Edlich RF; Mason SS; Reddig JS; Gubler K; Long Iii WB
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 2010; 29(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 20932243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of vitamin D metabolic markers by mass spectrometry: current techniques, limitations of the "gold standard" method, and anticipated future directions.
    Volmer DA; Mendes LR; Stokes CS
    Mass Spectrom Rev; 2015; 34(1):2-23. PubMed ID: 24318020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical controversies in vitamin D: 25(OH)D measurement, target concentration, and supplementation.
    Binkley N; Wiebe D
    J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 24183636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Review: higher vitamin D status and supplementation may be associated with risks.
    Korgavkar K; Xiong M; Weinstock MA
    Eur J Dermatol; 2014; 24(4):428-34. PubMed ID: 24721746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing Unnecessary Vitamin D Screening in an Academic Health System: What Works and When.
    Petrilli CM; Henderson J; Keedy JM; Dibble ER; Wei MY; Prussack JK; Greenberg G; Kerr EA
    Am J Med; 2018 Dec; 131(12):1444-1448. PubMed ID: 30063888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of vitamin D status in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Breslin LC; Magee PJ; Wallace JM; McSorley EM
    Proc Nutr Soc; 2011 Nov; 70(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 21861947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing vitamin D status: pitfalls for the unwary.
    Lai JK; Lucas RM; Clements MS; Harrison SL; Banks E
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2010 Aug; 54(8):1062-71. PubMed ID: 20397196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [VITAMIN D AND PREGNANCY].
    Hitrova-Nikolova S; Nikolov A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2015; 54(5):23-8. PubMed ID: 26411192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.