550 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29374994)
1. UK O&G trainees' attitudes to caesarean delivery for maternal request.
Aref-Adib M; Vlachodimitropoulou E; Khasriya R; Lamb BW; Selo-Ojeme D
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Apr; 38(3):367-371. PubMed ID: 29374994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Caesarean section at maternal request--the differing views of patients and healthcare professionals: a questionnaire based study.
Sharpe AN; Waring GJ; Rees J; McGarry K; Hinshaw K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Sep; 192():54-60. PubMed ID: 26151240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Personal birth preferences and actual mode of delivery outcomes of obstetricians and gynaecologists in South West England; with comparison to regional and national birth statistics.
Lightly K; Shaw E; Dailami N; Bisson D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Oct; 181():95-8. PubMed ID: 25129154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey.
Bergholt T; Østberg B; Legarth J; Weber T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Mar; 83(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 14995922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Turkish obstetricians' personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude toward cesarean delivery on maternal request.
Arikan DC; Ozer A; Arikan I; Coskun A; Kiran H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 20872227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Birth outcomes following cesarean delivery on maternal request: a population-based cohort study.
Guo Y; Murphy MSQ; Erwin E; Fakhraei R; Corsi DJ; White RR; Harvey ALJ; Gaudet LM; Walker MC; Wen SW; El-Chaâr D
CMAJ; 2021 May; 193(18):E634-E644. PubMed ID: 33941522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mode of delivery among Swedish midwives and obstetricians and their attitudes towards caesarean section.
Sahlin M; Andolf E; Edman G; Wiklund I
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2017 Mar; 11():112-116. PubMed ID: 28159121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study.
Rivo JC; Amyx M; Pingray V; Casale RA; Fiorillo AE; Krupitzki HB; Malamud JD; Mendilaharzu M; Medina ML; Del Pino AB; Ribola L; Schvartzman JA; Tartalo GM; Trasmonte M; Varela S; Althabe F; Belizán JM;
BJOG; 2018 Sep; 125(10):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 29325216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Why women request cesarean section without medical indication?
Dursun P; Yanik FB; Zeyneloglu HB; Baser E; Kuscu E; Ayhan A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1133-7. PubMed ID: 21668323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cesarean delivery on maternal request and its influencing factors in Chongqing, China.
Deng R; Tang X; Liu J; Gao Y; Zhong X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 May; 21(1):384. PubMed ID: 34011289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why do women request an elective cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons? A systematic review of the qualitative literature.
O'Donovan C; O'Donovan J
Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 29105822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Global incidence of caesarean deliveries on maternal request: a systematic review and meta-regression.
Begum T; Saif-Ur-Rahman KM; Yaqoot F; Stekelenburg J; Anuradha S; Biswas T; Doi SA; Mamun AA
BJOG; 2021 Apr; 128(5):798-806. PubMed ID: 32929868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Caesarean delivery on maternal request: consultants' view and practice in the west african sub region.
Obed J; Bako B; Agida T; Nwobodo E
J West Afr Coll Surg; 2013 Jan; 3(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 25453013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's views on elective primary caesarean section.
Pakenham S; Chamberlain SM; Smith GN
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Dec; 28(12):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 17169232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A case-control study of caesarean delivery on maternal request: who and why?
Lerner-Geva L; Glasser S; Levitan G; Boyko V; Golan A; Beloosesky R; Lunenfeld E; Many A; Samueloff A; Schiff E; Shoham A; Fisher M; Hirsh-Yechezkel G
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Sep; 29(17):2780-5. PubMed ID: 26526785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia.
Robson SJ; Tan WS; Adeyemi A; Dear KB
Birth; 2009 Sep; 36(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 19747267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Obstetricians' attitudes to caesarean delivery on maternal request in Nigeria.
Chigbu CO; Ezenyeaku CC; Ezenkwele EP
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(8):813-7. PubMed ID: 21126119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Placenta response of inflammation and oxidative stress in low-risk term childbirth: the implication of delivery mode.
Hu Y; Huang K; Sun Y; Wang J; Xu Y; Yan S; Zhu P; Tao F
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Dec; 17(1):407. PubMed ID: 29207957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: a western North Carolina perspective.
Romero ST; Coulson CC; Galvin SL
Matern Child Health J; 2012 Apr; 16(3):725-34. PubMed ID: 21400201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flemish obstetricians' personal preference regarding mode of delivery and attitude towards caesarean section on demand.
Jacquemyn Y; Ahankour F; Martens G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Dec; 111(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 14597245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]