250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29377291)
1. Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth?
O'Connor AR; Tidbury LP
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Jul; 101(4):485-494. PubMed ID: 29377291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Assessment of Stereoacuity and 3-D Stereoscopic Entertainment.
Tidbury LP; Black RH; O'Connor AR
Strabismus; 2015; 23(4):164-9. PubMed ID: 26669421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests.
Fawcett SL
J AAPOS; 2005 Dec; 9(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16414526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of Stereopsis in Patients with Impaired Binocularity.
Han SB; Yang HK; Kim J; Hong K; Lee B; Hwang JM
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 93(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 26927523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.
Holmes JM; Fawcett SL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):193-5. PubMed ID: 15652852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity to Velocity- and Disparity-Based Cues to Motion-In-Depth With and Without Spared Stereopsis in Binocular Visual Impairment.
Maloney RT; Kaestner M; Bruce A; Bloj M; Harris JM; Wade AR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Sep; 59(11):4375-4383. PubMed ID: 30193309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between depth perception by three-rods test and stereoacuity by distance Randot Stereotest.
Matsuo T; Negayama R; Sakata H; Hasebe K
Strabismus; 2014 Sep; 22(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 25058604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. From suppression to stereoacuity: a composite binocular function score for clinical research.
Webber AL; Wood JM; Thompson B; Birch EE
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 Jan; 39(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 30628744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The functional significance of stereopsis.
O'Connor AR; Birch EE; Anderson S; Draper H;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Apr; 51(4):2019-23. PubMed ID: 19933184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors influencing stereoacuity outcomes in adults with acquired strabismus.
Fawcett SL; Stager DR; Felius J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 15629283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of induced fusional demand on static and dynamic stereoacuity thresholds: the digital Synoptophore.
Tidbury LP; O'Connor AR; Wuerger SM
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 30616576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of a new Distance Randot stereoacuity test.
Fu VL; Birch EE; Holmes JM
J AAPOS; 2006 Oct; 10(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 17070476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders.
Fawcett SL; Birch EE
J AAPOS; 2003 Oct; 7(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14566315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship Between Binocular Summation and Stereoacuity After Strabismus Surgery.
Kattan JM; Velez FG; Demer JL; Pineles SL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 165():29-32. PubMed ID: 26921805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Random Dot Computer Video Game Improves Stereopsis.
Portela-Camino JA; Martín-González S; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Illarramendi-Mendicute I; Garrido-Mercado R
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Jun; 95(6):523-535. PubMed ID: 29787486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of stereopsis.
Westheimer G
Vision Res; 2013 Sep; 90():38-42. PubMed ID: 23092634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reduced stereoacuity as a predictor for clinically significant convergence insufficiency.
Leshno A; Stolovitch C; Zloto O; Blum Meirovitch S; Mezad-Koursh D
Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 105(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 32188680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stereoacuity outcomes following surgical correction of the nonaccommodative component in partially accommodative esotropia.
Kurup SP; Barto HW; Myung G; Mets MB
J AAPOS; 2018 Apr; 22(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 29526713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual Relearning of Binocular Fusion and Stereoacuity After Brain Injury.
Schaadt AK; Schmidt L; Reinhart S; Adams M; Garbacenkaite R; Leonhardt E; Kuhn C; Kerkhoff G
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 Jun; 28(5):462-71. PubMed ID: 24376065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of static and dynamic stereoacuity.
Zinn WJ; Solomon H
J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Sep; 56(9):712-5. PubMed ID: 4056294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
