These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29377334)

  • 1. Effect of finish line design on stress distribution in bilayer and monolithic zirconia crowns: a three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Miura S; Kasahara S; Yamauchi S; Egusa H
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2018 Apr; 126(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 29377334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Made of Translucent Zirconia with Variations in Framework Designs: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Bakitian F; Papia E; Larsson C; Vult von Steyern P
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):315-322. PubMed ID: 31971307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monolithic zirconia dental crowns. Internal fit, margin quality, fracture mode and load at fracture.
    Schriwer C; Skjold A; Gjerdet NR; Øilo M
    Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28662859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of various veneering techniques on mechanical strength of computer-controlled zirconia framework designs.
    Kanat B; Cömlekoğlu EM; Dündar-Çömlekoğlu M; Hakan Sen B; Ozcan M; Ali Güngör M
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):445-55. PubMed ID: 24417370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Veneering Methods on Zirconia Framework-Veneer Ceramic Adhesion and Fracture Resistance of Single Crowns.
    Kanat-Ertürk B; Çömlekoğlu EM; Dündar-Çömlekoğlu M; Özcan M; Güngör MA
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 24(8):620-8. PubMed ID: 25319017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monolithic crowns fracture analysis: The effect of material properties, cusp angle and crown thickness.
    Shahmoradi M; Wan B; Zhang Z; Wilson T; Swain M; Li Q
    Dent Mater; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1038-1051. PubMed ID: 32534794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
    Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel coping design to decrease maximum principal stress in zirconia ceramic restorations.
    Sung M; Han CH; Kim S
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):534-9. PubMed ID: 24750340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness.
    Nakamura K; Harada A; Inagaki R; Kanno T; Niwano Y; Milleding P; Örtengren U
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015; 73(8):602-8. PubMed ID: 25635734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CAD-FEA modeling and analysis of different full crown monolithic restorations.
    Dal Piva AMO; Tribst JPM; Borges ALS; Souza ROAE; Bottino MA
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1342-1350. PubMed ID: 29934125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Selection of optimal occlusal thickness and shoulder thickness in mandibular first molar all-ceramic crown: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
    Wang WG; Zhang SF; Chen JJ; Li Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 46(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 21612707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Load at fracture of monolithic and bilayered zirconia crowns with and without a cervical zirconia collar.
    Øilo M; Kvam K; Gjerdet NR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 26775244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of cement space on stress distribution in Y-TZP based crowns.
    Rezende CE; Borges AF; Gonzaga CC; Duan Y; Rubo JH; Griggs JA
    Dent Mater; 2017 Feb; 33(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 27890357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type.
    Ha SR
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 7(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 26816578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns.
    Sun T; Zhou S; Lai R; Liu R; Ma S; Zhou Z; Longquan S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():93-101. PubMed ID: 24762856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
    Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of the influence of geometry and design of zirconia crowns on stress distribution.
    Anami LC; Lima JM; Corazza PH; Yamamoto ET; Bottino MA; Borges AL
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Feb; 24(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 24975118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of thickness of zirconia-ceramic crown frameworks on strength and fracture pattern.
    Omori S; Komada W; Yoshida K; Miura H
    Dent Mater J; 2013; 32(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 23370889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.