230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29377533)
1. Microtensile bond strength of universal adhesives to flat versus Class I cavity dentin with pulpal pressure simulation.
Lezaja Zebic M; Dzeletovic B; Miletic V
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 May; 30(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 29377533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Slow progression of dentin bond degradation during one-year water storage under simulated pulpal pressure.
Belli R; Sartori N; Peruchi LD; Guimarães JC; Araújo E; Monteiro S; Baratieri LN; Lohbauer U
J Dent; 2010 Oct; 38(10):802-10. PubMed ID: 20599465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of a new method to simulate pulpal pressure on bond strength and nanoleakage of dental adhesives to dentin.
Feitosa VP; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sinhoreti MA
J Adhes Dent; 2012 Dec; 14(6):517-24. PubMed ID: 22724111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Delayed light activation of resin composite affects the bond strength of adhesives under dynamic simulated pulpal pressure.
Sukprasert N; Harnirattisai C; Senawongse P; Sano H; Saikaew P
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Nov; 26(11):6743-6752. PubMed ID: 35876892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primer application technique and remaining dentin thickness affected microtensile bond strength of contemporary dentin adhesives under simulated pulp pressure.
Somrit P; Tantilertanant Y; Srisawasdi S
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):139-149. PubMed ID: 36109375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of hydrostatic pulpal water pressure on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin.
Abdalla AI; Elsayed HY; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 18795519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin.
De Munck J; Van Meerbeek B; Satoshi I; Vargas M; Yoshida Y; Armstrong S; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):414-20. PubMed ID: 15002958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of C-Factor on Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives to Floor and Wall Dentin in Class-I Composite Restorations.
Fazelian N; Kasraei S; Khamverdi Z
J Adhes Dent; 2022 Mar; 24(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 35227041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Four-year water degradation of a total-etch and two self-etching adhesives bonded to dentin.
Abdalla AI; Feilzer AJ
J Dent; 2008 Aug; 36(8):611-7. PubMed ID: 18514996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of direct and indirect water storage on the microtensile dentin bond strength of a total-etch and two self-etching adhesives.
Abdalla AI; El Eraki M; Feilzer AJ
Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):370-4. PubMed ID: 18269127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microtensile bond strength to dentin and enamel of self-etch vs. etch-and-rinse modes of universal adhesives.
Cruz J; Sousa B; Coito C; Lopes M; Vargas M; Cavalheiro A
Am J Dent; 2019 Aug; 32(4):174-182. PubMed ID: 31436937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term In Vitro Adhesion of Polyalkenoate-based Adhesives to Dentin.
Sezinando A; Perdigão J; Ceballos L
J Adhes Dent; 2017; 19(4):305-316. PubMed ID: 28849802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Clinically Relevant Smear Layers and pH of Universal Adhesives on Dentin Bond Strength and Durability.
Hatirli H; Yerliyurt K
J Adhes Dent; 2022 Mar; 24(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 35322946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of hydrostatic pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of all-in-one self-etching adhesives.
Hosaka K; Nakajima M; Monticelli F; Carrilho M; Yamauti M; Aksornmuang J; Nishitani Y; Tay FR; Pashley DH; Tagami J
J Adhes Dent; 2007 Oct; 9(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 18297824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microtensile bond strength of one- and two-step self-etching adhesives on sclerotic dentin: the effects of thermocycling.
Xie C; Han Y; Zhao XY; Wang ZY; He HM
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):547-55. PubMed ID: 20945746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial characterization of 11 contemporary adhesives bonded to bur-cut dentin.
Sarr M; Kane AW; Vreven J; Mine A; Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 20166416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives--a microtensile bond strength and morphological study.
Frankenberger R; Perdigão J; Rosa BT; Lopes M
Dent Mater; 2001 Sep; 17(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 11445203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin.
Inoue S; Vargas MA; Abe Y; Yoshida Y; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G; Sano H; Van Meerbeek B
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 11803711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of water storage on resin-dentin bond strengths formed by different bonding approaches.
Martins GC; Calixto AL; Gomes OM; Loguercio AD; D'Alpino PH; Reis A
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 20139566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of water storage on the bonding effectiveness of 6 adhesives to Class I cavity dentin.
De Munck J; Shirai K; Yoshida Y; Inoue S; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Suzuki K; Shintani H; Van Meerbeek B
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 16924986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
