These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2937871)

  • 1. Individual differences in syllogistic reasoning: deduction rules or mental models?
    Galotti KM; Baron J; Sabini JP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1986 Mar; 115(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 2937871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The probability heuristics model of syllogistic reasoning.
    Chater N; Oaksford M
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Mar; 38(2):191-258. PubMed ID: 10090803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Highly reflective reasoners show no signs of belief inhibition.
    Svedholm-Häkkinen AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jan; 154():69-76. PubMed ID: 25499057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "At least one" problem with "some" formal reasoning paradigms.
    Schmidt JR; Thompson A
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):217-29. PubMed ID: 18323076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mental models in deductive reasoning.
    García-Madruga JA; Gutiérrez F; Carriedo N; Moreno S; Johnson-Laird PN
    Span J Psychol; 2002 Nov; 5(2):125-40. PubMed ID: 12428479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probabilistic representation in syllogistic reasoning: A theory to integrate mental models and heuristics.
    Hattori M
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():296-320. PubMed ID: 27710779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling Human Syllogistic Reasoning: The Role of "No Valid Conclusion".
    Riesterer N; Brand D; Dames H; Ragni M
    Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Jan; 12(1):446-459. PubMed ID: 31989760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Falsifying mental models: testing the predictions of theories of syllogistic reasoning.
    Newstead SE; Handley SJ; Buck E
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Mar; 27(2):344-54. PubMed ID: 10226444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do smart people have better intuitions?
    Thompson VA; Pennycook G; Trippas D; Evans JSBT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jul; 147(7):945-961. PubMed ID: 29975089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Belief bias and figural bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Morley NJ; Evans JS; Handley SJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 May; 57(4):666-92. PubMed ID: 15204128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Logic, Probability, and Pragmatics in Syllogistic Reasoning.
    Tessler MH; Tenenbaum JB; Goodman ND
    Top Cogn Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(3):574-601. PubMed ID: 35005842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Figural effects in a syllogistic evaluation paradigm: an inspection-time analysis.
    Stupple EJ; Ball LJ
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 17472095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Syllogistic reasoning time: disconfirmation disconfirmed.
    Thompson VA; Striemer CL; Reikoff R; Gunter RW; Campbell JI
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):184-9. PubMed ID: 12747506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The bright homunculus in our head: Individual differences in intuitive sensitivity to logical validity.
    Ghasemi O; Handley S; Howarth S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Mar; 75(3):508-535. PubMed ID: 34427470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in autonomic physiological responses between good and poor inductive reasoners.
    Melis C; van Boxtel A
    Biol Psychol; 2001 Nov; 58(2):121-46. PubMed ID: 11600241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reasoning strategies for suppositional deductions.
    Byrne RM; Handley SJ
    Cognition; 1997 Jan; 62(1):1-49. PubMed ID: 8997169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mental models and logical reasoning problems in the GRE.
    Yang Y; Johnson-Laird PN
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Dec; 7(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 11838893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Klauer KC; Musch J; Naumer B
    Psychol Rev; 2000 Oct; 107(4):852-84. PubMed ID: 11089409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Traditional difference-score analyses of reasoning are flawed.
    Heit E; Rotello CM
    Cognition; 2014 Apr; 131(1):75-91. PubMed ID: 24462712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in working memory capacity and resistance to belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1471-1484. PubMed ID: 27173000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.